Enhanced Ionic Conductivity in Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9: Unique Effect of Calcium Co‐doping

In order to identify new oxide ion-conducting materials in the ceria family of oxides, the unique effect of co-doping is explored and a novel series of $Ce_{0.8}Sm_{0.2}_xCa_xO_{2-\delta}$ compositions is identified that have enhanced properties compared to the singledoped $Ce_{0.8}Sm_{0.2}O_{1.9}$ and $Ce_{0.8}Ca_{0.2}O_{1.9}$ compositions. Moreover, the superior characteristics of the co-doped $Ce_{0.8}Sm_{0.2-x}-Ca_xO_{2-\delta}$ powders prepared by the mixed-fuel process aid in obtaining 98% dense ceramics upon sintering at $1200^o$C for 6 h.Though a linear increase in conductivity is observed by replacing Sm with Ca, the composition with the maximum amount of Ca and the minimum amount of Sm exhibits a significant improvement in properties compared to the rest in the series. The composition $Ce_{0.80}Sm_{0.05}Ca_{0.15}O_{2-\delta}$ exhibits a conductivity as high as 1.22 \times $10^{-1} Scm^{-1}$ at $700^o$ C with minimum activation energy (0.56 eV) and a superior chemical stability to reduction compared to any of the hitherto known (CaSm) compositions. The absence of $Ce^{III}$, confirmed both from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy, strongly suggests that the observed increase in conductivity is solely due to the oxide ion conductivity and not due to the partial electronic contribution arising from the presence of $Ce^{III}$ and $Ce^{IV}$. To conclude, the experimental results on the $Ce_{0.8}Sm_{0.2-x}Ca_xO_{2-\delta}$ series underscore the unique effect of calcium co-doping in identifying a cost-effective new composition, with a remarkably high conductivity and enhanced chemical stability to reduction, for technological applications.

[1]  Byong-Ho Kim,et al.  Effect of co-dopant addition on properties of gadolinia-doped ceria electrolyte , 2000 .

[2]  Song Chen,et al.  Gd3+ and Sm3+ co-doped ceria based electrolytes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells , 2004 .

[3]  J. H. Lee,et al.  Oxide ionic conductivity and microstructures of Sm- or La-doped CeO2-based systems , 2002 .

[4]  Feng-Yun Wang,et al.  Study on Gd3+ and Sm3+ co-doped ceria-based electrolytes , 2005 .

[5]  M. Dokiya,et al.  Electrical and Ionic Conductivity of Gd‐Doped Ceria , 2000 .

[6]  James H. White,et al.  Rational selection of advanced solid electrolytes for intermediate temperature fuel cells , 1992 .

[7]  J. Hanson,et al.  Lanthanum molybdenum oxide: Low-temperature synthesis and characterization , 2006 .

[8]  Yanchun Zhou,et al.  Effect of redox reaction on the sintering behavior of cerium oxide , 1997 .

[9]  H. S. Maiti,et al.  Nb-Doped La2Mo2O9: A New Material with High Ionic Conductivity , 2005 .

[10]  G. Mairesse,et al.  Recent Material Developments in Fast Oxide Ion Conductors , 1998 .

[11]  Brian C. H. Steele,et al.  Appraisal of Ce1−yGdyO2−y/2 electrolytes for IT-SOFC operation at 500°C , 2000 .

[12]  H. S. Maiti,et al.  A potential low-temperature oxide-ion conductor: La2−xBaxMo2O9 , 2004 .

[13]  G. Meng,et al.  Reactive Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 powder synthesized by carbonate coprecipitation: Sintering and electrical characteristics , 2006 .

[14]  S. A. Barnett,et al.  A direct-methane fuel cell with a ceria-based anode , 1999, Nature.

[15]  T. Wen,et al.  AC Impedance Investigation of Samarium-Doped Ceria , 2001 .

[16]  N. Sammes,et al.  Physical, chemical and electrochemical properties of pure and doped ceria , 2000 .

[17]  Harumi Yokokawa,et al.  Low temperature fabrication of (Y,Gd,Sm)-doped ceria electrolyte , 1996 .

[18]  P. Nascente,et al.  X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, x-ray absorption spectroscopy, and x-ray diffraction characterization of CuO–TiO2–CeO2 catalyst system , 2001 .

[19]  Philippe Knauth,et al.  Solid‐State Ionics: Roots, Status, and Future Prospects , 2002 .

[20]  K. Kendall,et al.  High temperature solid oxide fuel cells : fundamentals, design and applicatons , 2003 .

[21]  M. Romeo,et al.  Effect of surface treatments, photon and electron impacts on the ceria 3d core level , 1995 .

[22]  H. Yamamura,et al.  Improvement of Electrical Conductivity in Fluorite Related Y2O3 and Fluorite CeO2 Systems Based on A Unique Effective Index , 1999 .

[23]  John B. Goodenough Oxide-ion electrolytes , 2003 .

[24]  Hideaki Inaba,et al.  Ceria-based solid electrolytes , 1996 .

[25]  H. Yamamura,et al.  Application of a crystallographic index for improvement of the electrolytic properties of the CeO2-Sm2O3 system , 1999 .

[26]  H. Yahiro,et al.  Oxygen ion conductivity of the ceria-samarium oxide system with fluorite structure , 1988 .

[27]  H. Yamamura,et al.  Electrical conductivity of the systems, (Y1−xMx)3NbO7 (M=Ca, Mg) and Y3Nb1−xMxO7 (M′=Zr and Ce) , 1999 .

[28]  G. Balazs ac impedance studies of rare earth oxide doped ceria , 1995 .

[29]  H. S. Maiti,et al.  A Novel Approach to Develop Dense Lanthanum Calcium Chromite Sintered Ceramics with Very High Conductivity , 2004 .

[30]  V. Kharton,et al.  Transport properties of solid oxide electrolyte ceramics: a brief review , 2004 .

[31]  H. Yamamura,et al.  Preparation of an Alkali-Element or Alkali-Earth-Element-Doped CeO2–Sm2O3 System and Its Operation Properties as the Electrolyte in Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cells , 1998 .

[32]  Raymond J. Gorte,et al.  Direct oxidation of hydrocarbons in a solid-oxide fuel cell , 2000, Nature.

[33]  D. Lamas,et al.  Enhanced Ionic Conductivity in Nanostructured, Heavily Doped Ceria Ceramics , 2006 .

[34]  John T. S. Irvine,et al.  Electroceramics: Characterization by Impedance Spectroscopy , 1990 .

[35]  A. Mcevoy,et al.  Lanthanide co-doping of solid electrolytes: AC conductivity behaviour , 1999 .

[36]  Mogens Bjerg Mogensen,et al.  Factors controlling the oxide ion conductivity of fluorite and perovskite structured oxides , 2004 .

[37]  M. Greenblatt,et al.  Properties of sol-gel prepared Ce1-xSmxO2-x/2 solid electrolytes , 1997 .