A Dynamic Penalty Cost Allocation Based Uncertain Wind Energy Scheduling in Smart Grid

The intermittent nature of wind energy conversion presents a risk to the Independent System Operator (ISO) in a real time electricity market. Consequently, there is a need to appropriately incorporate this risk in the wind energy scheduling paradigm. In the present work, the intermittency associated risk has been modeled as part of a cost optimization problem for the ISO in real time. A model to minimize the risk has also been proposed using various cost models that use dynamic risk aversion costs and reflect the market and system operating conditions. The two dynamic penalty cost/risk models included are, rescheduling cost and contractual compensation cost for wind energy deviation. The results obtained are compared with those from the deterministic model. The proposed approach is simulated on the IEEE 30 bus system and the findings from the proposed approach for wind energy scheduling lead to a low operational cost to the ISO in the real time market considered in the study. Among other observations, the consideration of uncertainty in Day-Ahead market leads to increase in cost savings of ISO with increase in wind uncertainty, but a corresponding reduction in the scheduled wind energy in the same market.

[1]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Economic Valuation of Reserves in Power Systems With High Penetration of Wind Power , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  H. Bessembinder,et al.  Equilibrium Pricing and Optimal Hedging in Electricity Forward Markets , 1999 .

[3]  Fei Zeng,et al.  Adequacy and responsibility of locational generation and transmission-optimization procedures , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  D. Kirschen,et al.  Optimal scheduling of spinning reserve , 1999 .

[5]  João P. S. Catalão,et al.  Optimal Offering Strategies for Wind Power Producers Considering Uncertainty and Risk , 2012, IEEE Systems Journal.

[6]  Abhijit R. Abhyankar,et al.  Optimum day-ahead clearing of energy and reserve markets with wind power generation using anticipated real-time adjustment costs , 2015 .

[7]  F. Longstaff,et al.  Electricity Forward Prices: A High-Frequency Empirical Analysis , 2002 .

[8]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  Lessons from the History of Independent System Operators in the Energy Sector, with applications to the Water Sector , 2011 .

[9]  P. Shamsollahi,et al.  Functional requirements for Southwest Power Pool Energy Imbalance market dispatch , 2009, 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech.

[10]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Transaction analysis in deregulated power systems using game theory , 1997 .

[11]  Jichen Zhang,et al.  A Stochastic Programming Model for a Day-Ahead Electricity Market With Real-Time Reserve Shortage Pricing , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Salvina Gagliano,et al.  Hybrid solar/wind power system probabilistic modelling for long-term performance assessment , 2006 .

[13]  Peter Sorknæs,et al.  Future power market and sustainable energy solutions – The treatment of uncertainties in the daily operation of combined heat and power plants , 2015 .

[14]  Wilsun Xu,et al.  Economic Load Dispatch Constrained by Wind Power Availability: A Here-and-Now Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[15]  B. Wollenberg,et al.  Risk assessment of generators bidding in day-ahead market , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Mohammad. Rasul,et al.  Analysis of Wind Energy Conversion System Using Weibull Distribution , 2014 .

[17]  Azza A. Eldesouky,et al.  Security constrained generation scheduling for grids incorporating wind, photovoltaic and thermal power , 2014 .

[18]  Peng Wang,et al.  Optimal spinning reserve allocation in deregulated power systems , 2005 .

[19]  Shye-Chorng Kuo,et al.  Comparative analysis on power curve models of wind turbine generator in estimating capacity factor , 2014 .