Action Properties of Object Images Facilitate Visual Search
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. C. Oldfield. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.
[2] Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al. A Dissociation between the Representation of Tool-use Skills and Hand Dominance: Insights from Left- and Right-handed Callosotomy Patients , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[3] M. Goodale. Hemispheric differences in motor control , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.
[4] Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al. Asymmetrical Body Perception , 2009, Psychological science.
[5] Robert W Proctor,et al. Correspondence Effects with Torches: Grasping Affordance or Visual Feature Asymmetry? , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[6] R. Desimone,et al. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.
[7] Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al. Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[8] G. Humphreys,et al. The case of the unfamiliar implement: Schema-based over-riding of semantic knowledge from objects in everyday action , 2007, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
[9] G. Humphreys,et al. Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .
[10] Paul Cisek,et al. Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[11] G. Humphreys. Beyond Serial Stages for Attentional Selection: The Critical Role of Action , 2013 .
[12] R. Passingham,et al. Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.
[13] G. Humphreys,et al. Knowing What You Need But Not What You Want: Affordances and Action-Defined Templates in Neglect , 2002, Behavioural Neurology.
[14] David L. Sheinberg,et al. Shape beyond recognition: form-derived directionality and its effects on visual attention and motion perception. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[15] Katherine L. Roberts,et al. Action relations facilitate the identification of briefly-presented objects , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[16] Harry Heft. An examination of constructivist and gibsonian approaches to environmental psychology , 1981 .
[17] A. Mack,et al. Potentiation of action by undetected affordant objects , 2008 .
[18] Anna Schubö,et al. Modulation of visual attention by object affordance , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[19] R. Proctor,et al. The object-based Simon effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[20] U. Neisser. VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.
[21] Jody C Culham,et al. Is That within Reach? fMRI Reveals That the Human Superior Parieto-Occipital Cortex Encodes Objects Reachable by the Hand , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[22] Robert L. Whitwell,et al. Left handedness does not extend to visually guided precision grasping , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.
[23] Jody C. Culham,et al. Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects , 2011, Scientific reports.
[24] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Action relationships concatenate representations of separate objects in the ventral visual system , 2010, NeuroImage.
[25] Claudia L. R. Gonzalez,et al. Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles? , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.
[26] Scott T. Grafton,et al. Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.
[27] Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al. The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[28] M. Goodale,et al. Hand preference for precision grasping predicts language lateralization , 2009, Neuropsychologia.
[29] Agnieszka Wykowska,et al. How you move is what you see: action planning biases selection in visual search. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[30] The role of perceptual load in action affordance by ignored objects , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[31] E. Reed. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .
[32] Jody C. Culham,et al. Neuroimaging reveals enhanced activation in a reach-selective brain area for objects located within participants’ typical hand workspaces , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[33] Kevin J. Hawley,et al. Novel popout: Empirical boundaries and tentative theory. , 1993 .
[34] Denis G. Pelli,et al. ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.
[35] J. Norman. Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[36] P. Bryden,et al. Under what conditions will right-handers use their left hand? The effects of object orientation, object location, arm position, and task complexity in preferential reaching , 2011, Laterality.
[37] Alice Mado Proverbio,et al. 250ms to code for action affordance during observation of manipulable objects , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[38] L. E. Rohr,et al. The effects of skill demands and object position on the distribution of preferred hand reaches , 2004, Brain and Cognition.
[39] Alex Martin,et al. Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.
[40] W. Johnston,et al. Attention capture by novel stimuli. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[41] L. E. Rohr,et al. Reaching patterns across working space: The effects of handedness, task demands, and comfort levels , 2006, Laterality.
[42] G. Humphreys,et al. Action relations, semantic relations, and familiarity of spatial position in Balint’s syndrome: Crossover effects on perceptual report and on localization , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[43] G. Humphreys,et al. The paired-object affordance effect. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[44] J. Kalaska,et al. Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.
[45] R. Ellis,et al. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[46] R. Proctor,et al. An electrophysiological study of the object-based correspondence effect: Is the effect triggered by an intended grasping action? , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[47] A. Schubö,et al. Action Intentions Modulate Allocation of Visual Attention: Electrophysiological Evidence , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[48] G. Humphreys,et al. Effects of action relations on the configural coding between objects. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[49] G W Humphreys,et al. Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[50] J. H. Flowers,et al. How does familiarity affect visual search for letter strings? , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.
[51] Robert W. Proctor,et al. Does the Concept of Affordance Add Anything to Explanations of Stimulus–Response Compatibility Effects? , 2014 .
[52] Harry Heft. An Ecological Approach to Psychology , 2013 .
[53] Katherine L. Roberts,et al. The interaction of attention and action: from seeing action to acting on perception. , 2010, British journal of psychology.
[54] D. Carey,et al. One hand or the other? Effector selection biases in right and left handers , 2014, Neuropsychologia.
[55] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[56] Daniel N Bub,et al. Features of Planned Hand Actions Influence Identification of Graspable Objects , 2013, Psychological science.
[57] P. Bryden,et al. Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children. , 2006, Developmental psychobiology.
[58] J. Pratt,et al. Left hand, but not right hand, reaching is sensitive to visual context , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.
[59] H. Bekkering,et al. Visual Search Is Modulated by Action Intentions , 2002, Psychological science.
[60] Tzvi Ganel,et al. Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.
[61] C. Gonzalez,et al. The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[62] R. Ward,et al. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation , 2002 .
[63] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[64] G. Humphreys,et al. Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.
[65] Scott T. Grafton,et al. A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.
[66] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[67] Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al. Perception and action. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.
[68] C. Gonzalez,et al. Is that graspable? Let your right hand be the judge , 2015, Brain and Cognition.
[69] M. Wertheimer. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .
[70] H. Deubel,et al. Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping , 2010, Vision Research.