Lesser tuberosity is more reliable than bicipital groove when determining orientation of humeral head in primary shoulder arthroplasty

[1]  A. Rodríguez-Baeza,et al.  The pectoralis major tendon as a reference for restoring humeral length and retroversion with hemiarthroplasty for fracture. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  T. Wright,et al.  Reconstructing Proximal Humeral Fractures Using the Bicipital Groove as a Landmark , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  J. Warner,et al.  Pectoralis major tendon reference (PMT): a new method for accurate restoration of humeral length with hemiarthroplasty for fracture. , 2006, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[4]  F. Balg,et al.  Bicipital groove orientation: considerations for the retroversion of a prosthesis in fractures of the proximal humerus. , 2006, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[5]  A. Hernigou,et al.  Determining Humeral Retroversion with Computed Tomography , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  P Boileau,et al.  Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. , 2002, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[7]  J. Tibone,et al.  Analysis of the bicipital groove as a landmark for humeral head replacement. , 2002, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  L. Fabeck,et al.  Computed tomography evaluation of shoulder prosthesis retroversion. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[9]  M. Leunig,et al.  Surgical landmarks to determine humeral head retrotorsion for hemiarthroplasty in fractures. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  J. Damilakis,et al.  The bicipital groove as a landmark for orientation of the humeral prosthesis in cases of fracture. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  D D Robertson,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Proximal Part of the Humerus: Relevance to Arthroplasty* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  M. Freeman,et al.  Ten-year survival of the cemented Freeman-Samuelson primary knee arthroplasty. Data from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register and the Royal London Hospital. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  I. Pinder,et al.  Health outcome after total knee replacement in the very elderly. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  M. Pearl,et al.  Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  G. Edelson.  Variations in the retroversion of the humeral head. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[16]  R. Burks,et al.  Comparison of humeral head retroversion with the humeral axis/biceps groove relationship: a study in live subjects and cadavers. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[17]  F. Kummer,et al.  The use of the bicipital groove for alignment of the humeral stem in shoulder arthroplasty. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[18]  Gilles Walch,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Geometry of the Proximal Humerus: Implications for Surgical Technique and Prosthetic Design , 1997 .

[19]  L. Bigliani,et al.  Arthroplasty and acute shoulder trauma. Reasons for success and failure. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  E. Tillett,et al.  Anatomic determination of humeral head retroversion: The relationship of the central axis of the humeral head to the bicipital groove. , 1993, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[21]  M. Kronberg,et al.  Retroversion of the humeral head in the normal shoulder and its relationship to the normal range of motion. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.