p53 in breast cancer subtypes and new insights into response to chemotherapy.

Despite an obvious central role of p53 in the hallmarks of cancer, TP53 status is not yet used for the management of breast cancer. Recent findings may lead to reconsider the role of p53 in breast cancer. TP53 mutations are the most frequent genetic alterations in breast cancer, observed in 30% of breast carcinomas. Their distribution is highly linked to molecular tumor subtypes found in 26% of luminal tumors (17% of luminal A, 41% of luminal B), in 50% of HER2 amplified tumors, in 69% of molecular apocrine breast carcinomas and in 88% of basal-like carcinomas. The type of mutation is linked to the tumor subtype with higher frequency of base-pair substitutions in luminal tumors, whereas molecular apocrine and basal-like tumors present much higher frequency of complex mutations (deletions/insertions). The timing of TP53 mutation also depends on the tumor subtype, being the first important event in luminal tumors but occurring after PTEN loss in basal-like tumors. Regarding response to cytotoxic chemotherapy, the situation is far from the p53-dependent apoptosis paradigm with subsequent clinical response. We reported that TP53 mutated non inflammatory locally advanced breast carcinomas had a high rate of complete pathological response to dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, while TP53 wild-type (WT) tumors never achieved complete response. Using human breast cancer xenograft models, we suggested that this could be due to the induction of senescence in TP53 WT tumor cells. A recent work confirmed these findings in MMTV-Wnt1 mammary tumors, showing that growth arrest and senescent phenotype, not apoptosis, were induced in TP53 WT tumors following doxorubicin treatment, while lack of arrest in mutant tumors resulted in aberrant mitoses, cell death and a superior clinical response. Furthermore, in ER positive (ER(+)) breast tumors, it has been recently reported that ER represses the p53-mediated apoptotic response induced by DNA damage. Taken together, these data can help to better understand p53-mediated response to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer: in ER(+) TP53 WT breast cancers, ER-induced inhibition of p53 apoptotic response would lead preferentially to tumor cell senescence and subsequent resistance to treatment. Conversely, in ER negative (ER(-)) TP53 mutated breast cancers, accumulation of genetic abnormalities would lead to mitotic catastrophe and subsequent better response. In view of these recent results, p53 impact in breast cancer should be reconsidered.

[1]  R. Bast,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  M. Espié,et al.  Distinct tumor protein p53 mutants in breast cancer subgroups , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[3]  C. Perou,et al.  The genomic landscape of breast cancer as a therapeutic roadmap. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[4]  T. Aas,et al.  Predictive and Prognostic Impact of TP53 Mutations and MDM2 Promoter Genotype in Primary Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Epirubicin or Paclitaxel , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  P. Campbell,et al.  Next-generation sequencing in breast cancer: first take home messages , 2012, Current opinion in oncology.

[6]  M. Espié,et al.  Exquisite Sensitivity of TP53 Mutant and Basal Breast Cancers to a Dose-Dense Epirubicin−Cyclophosphamide Regimen , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[7]  M. Poupon,et al.  p53 dependent cell‐cycle arrest triggered by chemotherapy in xenografted breast tumors , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[8]  D. Housman,et al.  p53-dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents , 1993, Cell.

[9]  Jason I. Herschkowitz,et al.  Comparative oncogenomics identifies breast tumors enriched in functional tumor-initiating cells , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Pierre Hainaut,et al.  TP53: Coordinator of the Processes That Underlie the Hallmarks of Cancer , 2013 .

[11]  T. Aas,et al.  Influence of TP53 gene alterations and c-erbB-2 expression on the response to treatment with doxorubicin in locally advanced breast cancer. , 2001, Cancer research.

[12]  Elia Biganzoli,et al.  TP53 Mutation, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, and Stemlike Features in Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2012, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[13]  Tanja Cufer,et al.  TP53 status for prediction of sensitivity to taxane versus non-taxane neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00): a randomised phase 3 trial. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  M. Espié,et al.  Effect of mutated TP53 on response of advanced breast cancers to high-dose chemotherapy , 2002, The Lancet.

[15]  A. El‐Naggar,et al.  p53-mediated senescence impairs the apoptotic response to chemotherapy and clinical outcome in breast cancer. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[16]  Hyunjin Shin,et al.  Estrogen receptor prevents p53-dependent apoptosis in breast cancer , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  p53 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and stem cell properties through modulating miRNAs , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  Y. Qi,et al.  Distinct p53 Gene Signatures Are Needed to Predict Prognosis and Response to Chemotherapy in ER-Positive and ER-Negative Breast Cancers , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  M. Espié,et al.  Cyclophosphamide dose intensification may circumvent anthracycline resistance of p53 mutant breast cancers. , 2010, The oncologist.

[20]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Disruption of p53 in human cancer cells alters the responses to therapeutic agents. , 1999, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  M. Olivier,et al.  Impact of mutant p53 functional properties on TP53 mutation patterns and tumor phenotype: lessons from recent developments in the IARC TP53 database , 2007, Human mutation.

[22]  M. Gönen,et al.  Evolutionary pathways in BRCA1-associated breast tumors. , 2012, Cancer discovery.