Effect of Particle Size and Liquid Viscosity on Erosion in Annular and Slug Flow

Erosion measurements in multiphase slug and annular flow regimes have been made in a horizontal 76.2 mm (3-in.) diameter pipe. These flow regimes are selected since they produce higher metal losses than other flow regimes, and they also occur for a wide variety of operating conditions. Experiments are performed with superficial gas velocities ranging from 15.2 m/s (50 ft/s) to 45.7 m/s (150 ft/s) and superficial liquid velocities ranging from 0.46 m/s (1.5 ft/s) to 0.76 m/s (2.5 ft/s), for liquid viscosities of 1 cP and 10 cP. Three different sand sizes (20, 150, and 300 μm sand) were used for performing tests. The shapes of the sand are also different with the 20 and 300 μm sand being sharper than the 150 μm sand. Erosion measurements are obtained using electrical resistance (ER) probes which relate the change in electrical resistance to the change in the thickness of an exposed element resulting from erosion. Two probes are placed in a bend and another probe is placed in a straight section of pipe. The probes in the bend are flat-head probes, and they are placed flush with the outer wall in the 45 deg and 90 deg positions. The probe in the straight pipe is an angle-head probe which protrudes into the flow with the face placed in the center of the pipe.

[1]  Eduardo Pereyra,et al.  State of the Art of Experimental Studies and Predictive Methods for Slug Liquid Holdup , 2012 .

[2]  E. Sciubba,et al.  A study of sootblower erosion in waste-incinerating heat boilers , 2007 .

[3]  Edmund F. Rybicki,et al.  Predicting Sand Erosion In Slug Flows Using A Two-Dimensional Mechanistic Model , 2011 .

[4]  S. Shirazi,et al.  A Comprehensive Procedure to Estimate Erosion in Elbows for Gas/Liquid/Sand Multiphase Flow , 2006 .

[5]  John Kent,et al.  Analysis of boiler-tube erosion by the technique of acoustic emission: Part I. Mechanical erosion , 2001 .

[6]  Y. Oka,et al.  The impact angle dependence of erosion damage caused by solid particle impact , 1997 .

[7]  Eissa Al-Safran,et al.  Prediction of Slug Liquid Holdup in Horizontal Pipes , 2009 .

[8]  Eissa M. Alsafran,et al.  Prediction of Slug Length Distribution Along a Hilly Terrain Pipeline Using Slug Tracking Model , 2004 .

[9]  Quamrul Mazumder,et al.  Distribution of Sand Particles in Horizontal and Vertical Annular Multiphase Flow in Pipes and the Effects on Sand Erosion , 2005 .

[10]  John M. Sankovic,et al.  Investigations of particle velocities in a slurry pump using PIV: Part 1, the tongue and adjacent channel flow , 2004 .

[11]  Yehuda Taitel,et al.  Two-Phase Slug Flow , 1990 .

[12]  M. Salama,et al.  Evaluation of API RP 14E erosional velocity limitations for offshore gas wells , 1983 .

[13]  A. Bourgoyne Experimental Study of Erosion in Diverter Systems Due to Sand Production , 1989 .

[14]  J. P. Brill,et al.  Unified model for gas-liquid pipe flow via slug dynamics: Part 1: Model development , 2003 .

[15]  Qian Wang,et al.  Unified Model for Gas-Liquid Pipe Flow via Slug Dynamics—Part 2: Model Validation , 2003 .

[16]  Qian Wang,et al.  A unified mechanistic model for slug liquid holdup and transition between slug and dispersed bubble flows , 2003 .

[17]  J. Fabre,et al.  MODELING OF TWO-PHASE SLUG FLOW , 1992 .