Scalar mixing in direct numerical simulations of temporally evolving plane jet flames with skeletal CO/H2 kinetics ☆

Direct numerical simulations of three-dimensional turbulent temporally evolving plane CO/H2 jet flames are performed with detailed chemistry at Reynolds numbers of up to 9000 and with up to 500 million grid points. The effect of Reynolds number on turbulent mixing properties and flame structure is quantified for low Damkohler number flames. These flames exhibit strong flame–turbulence interactions resulting in local extinction followed by re-ignition. The probability density of the stoichiometric scalar dissipation rate is found to be nearly log-normal with some negative skewness. Conditional statistics of the hydroxyl radical reveal increasing levels of extinction and longer re-ignition times with increasing Reynolds number. The mechanical-to-scalar mixing time scale ratio, a key quantity in transported probability density function (pdf) modeling, is investigated for both conserved and reacting scalars. The conserved scalar timescale ratio is found to be consistent with prior studies. For reacting scalars, the effects of molecular diffusivity and chemical reaction on the timescale ratio are quantified.

[1]  James J. Riley,et al.  Investigation of the influence of the Reynolds number on extinction and reignition , 2004 .

[2]  S. Pope PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows , 1985 .

[3]  T. Takeno,et al.  A numerical analysis of the structure of a turbulent hydrogen jet lifted flame , 2002 .

[4]  J. Janicka,et al.  Closure of the Transport Equation for the Probability Density Funcfion of Turbulent Scalar Fields , 1979 .

[5]  Robert S. Barlow,et al.  Measurements of flame orientation and scalar dissipation in turbulent partially premixed methane flames , 2005 .

[6]  H. Pitsch,et al.  Flamelet modelling of non-premixed turbulent combustion with local extinction and re-ignition , 2003 .

[7]  F. Egolfopoulos,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of heat release and NOx formation in turbulent nonpremixed flames , 1999 .

[8]  C. Pantano,et al.  Direct simulation of non-premixed flame extinction in a methane–air jet with reduced chemistry , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  M. Carpenter,et al.  Several new numerical methods for compressible shear-layer simulations , 1994 .

[10]  Robert J. Kee,et al.  PREMIX :A F ORTRAN Program for Modeling Steady Laminar One-Dimensional Premixed Flames , 1998 .

[11]  A. Masri,et al.  Turbulent lifted flames in a vitiated coflow investigated using joint PDF calculations , 2005 .

[12]  T. Poinsot,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF NON-PREMIXED TURBULENT FLAMES , 1998 .

[13]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of a passive scalar with imposed mean gradient in isotropic turbulence , 1996 .

[14]  N. Peters Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion , 1984 .

[15]  W. Dahm,et al.  Experimental study of the fine-scale structure of conserved scalar mixing in turbulent shear flows. Part 2. Sc≈1 , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  Robert W. Dibble,et al.  The local structure of turbulent nonpremixed flames near extinction , 1990 .

[17]  F. Williams,et al.  Mixing of a conserved scalar in a turbulent reacting shear layer , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Prakash Vedula,et al.  Dynamics of scalar dissipation in isotropic turbulence: a numerical and modelling study , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Lognormality of the scalar dissipation pdf in turbulent flows , 1989 .

[20]  Noel T. Clemens,et al.  The structure of fine-scale scalar mixing in gas-phase planar turbulent jets , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Rodney O. Fox,et al.  The Lagrangian spectral relaxation model for differential diffusion in homogeneous turbulence , 1999 .

[22]  Zellman Warhaft,et al.  An experimental study of the decay of temperature fluctuations in grid-generated turbulence , 1978, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  R. Lewis,et al.  Low-storage, Explicit Runge-Kutta Schemes for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 2000 .

[24]  J.-Y. Chen,et al.  Modeling Differential Diffusion Effects in Turbulent Nonreacting/Reacting Jets with Stochastic Mixing Models , 1998 .

[25]  Andrew E. Lutz,et al.  OPPDIF: A Fortran program for computing opposed-flow diffusion flames , 1997 .

[26]  A. Kronenburg,et al.  Modelling Differential Diffusion in Nonpremixed Reacting Turbulent Flow: Application to Turbulent Jet Flames , 2001 .

[27]  C. Dopazo,et al.  An approach to the autoignition of a turbulent mixture , 1974 .

[28]  Christopher A. Kennedy,et al.  Improved boundary conditions for viscous, reacting, compressible flows , 2003 .

[29]  Robert J. Kee,et al.  A FORTRAN COMPUTER CODE PACKAGE FOR THE EVALUATION OF GAS-PHASE, MULTICOMPONENT TRANSPORT PROPERTIES , 1986 .

[30]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  A mixing model for turbulent reactive flows based on Euclidean minimum spanning trees , 1998 .

[31]  Robert W. Bilger,et al.  Some Aspects of Scalar Dissipation , 2004 .

[32]  R. Fox Computational Models for Turbulent Reacting Flows , 2003 .

[33]  Robert J. Kee,et al.  CHEMKIN-III: A FORTRAN chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical and plasma kinetics , 1996 .