The influence of audio-visual interactions on the annoyance ratings for wind turbines

Abstract Annoyance has a negative influence on health and well-being, and over a longer time, it can increase the risk of stress, sleep disturbance, obesity and even heart attacks. The aim of this paper was to investigate the influence of audio-visual information on the assessment of annoyance caused by wind turbines. Seven soundscapes and seven landscapes were presented to 44 participants in an anechoic chamber with an ambisonic set up of 25 + 1 loudspeakers, and a large sound-permeable screen for visual presentation. First, participants were presented with auditory samples and asked to rate the noise annoyance on the ICBEN scale. Subsequently, they were asked to identify the sound sources. Second, participants were presented with visual samples and asked to rate their annoyance. Last, participants were presented with audio-visual mixes and again asked to rate their annoyance. The obtained results suggest that sound level of auditory presentation was the most influential factor in the annoyance assessment. The second most influential factor was the presented visual sample, and the least influential factor was the presented audio samples. Recognition of wind turbines tended to increase the annoyance ratings of the small wind turbines audio sample. Moreover, the participants who recognized the wind turbine also tended to rate the transportation samples as more annoying, but not the natural-like samples. In general, the audio and audio-visual samples of wind turbines were assessed similarly to the transportation samples, but not to the natural-like samples.

[1]  E. Pedersen,et al.  The impact of visual factors on noise annoyance among people living in the vicinity of wind turbines , 2008 .

[2]  S. Janssen,et al.  Personal and situational variables associated with wind turbine noise annoyance. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Katya Feder,et al.  Exposure to wind turbine noise: Perceptual responses and reported health effects. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  H. Vos,et al.  A comparison between exposure-response relationships for wind turbine annoyance and annoyance due to other noise sources. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Annelies Bockstael,et al.  Annoyance, detection and recognition of wind turbine noise. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Sound alters visual motion perception , 1997, Nature.

[7]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[8]  Zhang Bang-jun,et al.  The influence of the visibility of the source on the subjective annoyance due to its noise , 2003 .

[9]  B. Moore,et al.  A revision of Zwicker's loudness model , 1996 .

[10]  C. Chau,et al.  Can surrounding greenery reduce noise annoyance at home? , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Jørgen Jakobsen,et al.  Infrasound Emission from Wind Turbines , 2005 .

[12]  J. Ioannidis Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[13]  H. Fastl Audio-visual interactions in loudness evaluation , 2004 .

[14]  E. Pedersen,et al.  Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise--a dose-response relationship. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Trevor J. Cox The effect of visual stimuli on the horribleness of awful sounds , 2008 .

[16]  C. Lavandier,et al.  Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment , 2002 .

[17]  Tomasz Kaczmarek,et al.  Experimental studies on annoyance caused by noises from trams and buses , 2008 .

[18]  Eja Pedersen,et al.  Response to noise from modern wind farms in The Netherlands. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Jędrzej Kociński,et al.  Audio-visual interactions in environment assessment. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  A. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson,et al.  Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas , 2007 .

[21]  J. Ioannidis Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[22]  M. Nilsson Soundscape quality in urban open spaces , 2007 .

[23]  S A Stansfeld,et al.  Annoyance and other reaction measures to changes in noise exposure - a review. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  I. Howard,et al.  Human Spatial Orientation , 1966 .

[25]  F. Colavita Human sensory dominance , 1974 .

[26]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 1990 .

[27]  R. Nuzzo How scientists fool themselves – and how they can stop , 2015, Nature.

[28]  T. Guidotti,et al.  Understanding the Evidence: Wind Turbine Noise. The expert panel on wind turbine noise and human health , 2015 .

[29]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Takashi Yano,et al.  STANDARDIZED GENERAL-PURPOSE NOISE REACTION QUESTIONS FOR COMMUNITY NOISE SURVEYS: RESEARCH AND A RECOMMENDATION , 2001 .

[31]  K. Persson Waye,et al.  Wind turbine noise, annoyance and self-reported health and well-being in different living environments , 2007, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[32]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Infrasound and low frequency noise from wind turbines: exposure and health effects , 2011 .

[33]  M. Wallace,et al.  Unifying multisensory signals across time and space , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Woo Young Choi,et al.  Annoyance caused by amplitude modulation of wind turbine noise , 2011 .