PHYSICAL EXAMPLES IN ENGINEERING IDEA GENERATION: AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

Design fixation is a major concern in engineering idea generation because it restricts the solution space in which designers search for their ideas. For designers to be more creative, it is essential to mitigate fixation. The majority of studies investigate the role of pictorial stimuli in design fixation. The role of examples presented in other formats, including physical prototypes, is largely unknown. This paper presents a study that compares design fixation, in novice designers, caused by pictorial and physical representations. The effects of defixating materials are also investigated. The results show that both formats cause the same magnitude of fixation; however, participants utilizing physical examples produce a greater quantity of complete ideas. The defixation materials do not facilitate novice designers‘ mitigation of their fixation.

[1]  Robert J. Youmans,et al.  The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation , 2011 .

[2]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Physical Models and Design Thinking: A Study of Functionality, Novelty and Variety of Ideas. , 2012 .

[3]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Design Fixation in Physical Modeling: An Investigation on the Role of Sunk Cost , 2011 .

[4]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[5]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas , 2005, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[6]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Development of a Functional Basis for Design , 2000 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[8]  Richard Alterman,et al.  Adaptive Planning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Robert L. Nagel,et al.  Exploring the Use of Functional Models in Biomimetic Conceptual Design , 2008 .

[10]  Takashi Kiriyama,et al.  Strategic knowledge acquisition: a case study of learning through prototyping , 1998, Knowl. Based Syst..

[11]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Constraints on Analogical Inference , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments , 2000 .

[13]  Matti Perttula,et al.  The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation , 2007 .

[14]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Developing Engineering Products Using Inspiration From Nature , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[15]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem Re-Representation , 2012 .

[16]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  UNDERSTANDING FIXATION: A STUDY ON THE ROLE OF EXPERTISE , 2011 .

[17]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[18]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[19]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[20]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods , 2011 .

[21]  K. Dugosh,et al.  Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming , 2005 .

[22]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Design Fixation on Non-Verbal Stimuli: The Influence of Simple vs. Rich Pictorial Information on Design Problem-Solving , 2009 .

[24]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  A Study on the Role of Expertise in Design Fixation and its Mitigation , 2012 .