The association between benchmarking and organizational performance: an empirical investigation

This study examines the effect of four measures related to benchmarking and its successful implementation on organizational performance, controlling for size and industry. The four benchmarking measures are (1) internal preliminary competitive analysis, (2) external preliminary competitive analysis, (3) degree of organizational commitment, and (4) prior benchmarking experience (Elnathan et al. 1996). Data for the study was obtained from 157 U.S. manufacturing business units using a questionnaire instrument. The results indicate that three of the benchmarking measures have a positive effect on organizational performance that is significant. Prior experience with benchmarking, the commitment of the organization to benchmarking and internal preliminary competitive analysis meaningfully enhance firm performance.

[1]  J. Hackman,et al.  Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues , 1995 .

[2]  Tim Morris,et al.  Can Commitment be Managed? A Longitudinal Study of Employee Commitment and Human Resource Policies , 1993 .

[3]  L. Shore,et al.  Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Relation to Work Performance and Turnover Intentions , 1989 .

[4]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[5]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Raymond W. LaForge,et al.  A Marketing Strategy Analysis of Small Retailers , 1986 .

[7]  R. Hutton,et al.  Benchmarking: a process‐driven tool for quality improvement , 1995 .

[8]  M. Sweeney Benchmarking for Strategic Manufacturing Management , 1994 .

[9]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. , 1974 .

[10]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[11]  R. Mayer,et al.  Predicting Participation and Production Outcomes Through a Two-Dimensional Model of Organizational Commitment , 1992 .

[12]  K. Dervitsiotis Benchmarking and business paradigm shifts , 2000 .

[13]  Sanjay L. Ahire,et al.  Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs , 1996 .

[14]  John Coopey,et al.  Reconsidering The Case For Organisational Commitment , 1991 .

[15]  Yoav Vardi,et al.  Relationships between job, organization, and career commitments and work outcomes—An integrative approach , 1980 .

[16]  C. Argyris Double Loop Learning in Organizations , 1996 .

[17]  L. Cronbach Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed , 1987 .

[18]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[19]  David T. Wilson,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Market Structure, Firm Structure, Strategy, and Market Orientation Culture on Dimensions of Small-Firm Performance , 1996 .

[20]  Jim Todd,et al.  World-Class Manufacturing , 1996 .

[21]  Chee W. Chow,et al.  The Effects of Alternative Types of Feedback on Product-Related Decision Performance: A Research Note , 1999 .

[22]  Byron J. Finch Japanese management techniques in small manufacturing companies: A strategy for implementation , 1986 .

[23]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Competitors' responses to easily imitated new products—exploring commercial banking product introductions , 1985 .

[24]  Neil Millward,et al.  The New Industrial Relations , 1994 .

[25]  J. Pearce,et al.  Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business-unit performance† , 1988 .

[26]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organisations , 1977 .

[27]  Robert M. Marsh,et al.  Organizational Commitment and Turnover: A Prediction Study. , 1977 .

[28]  Christopher S. Mabey,et al.  HRM Practices and Employee Commitment: Possibilities, Pitfalls and Paradoxes , 1990 .

[29]  Paul M. Swamidass,et al.  Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: a path analytic model , 1987 .

[30]  Mark S. Teachout,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORK EXPERIENCE AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A CONCEPTUAL AND META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW , 1995 .

[31]  Lynn A. McFarland,et al.  Cognitive Ability and Job Experience as Predictors of Work Performance , 1998 .

[32]  D. Randall Commitment and the Organization: The Organization Man Revisited , 1987 .

[33]  David Miller,et al.  Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firms , 1986 .

[34]  D. Slevin,et al.  Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments , 1989 .

[35]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[36]  M. Gordon,et al.  Empirical test of the validity of seniority as a factor in staffing decisions. , 1982 .

[37]  Douglas N. Jackson,et al.  Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts. , 1989 .

[38]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[39]  A. Campbell,et al.  Tailored, not benchmarked. A fresh look at corporate planning. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[40]  D. Longbottom Benchmarking in the UK: an empirical study of practitioners and academics , 2000 .

[41]  John Van Maanen,et al.  Police organization: A longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department. , 1975 .

[42]  R. Dubin,et al.  Unit Performance, Situational Factors and Employee Attitudes in Spatially Separated Work Units. , 1974 .

[43]  Robert H. Chenhall,et al.  Reliance on manufacturing performance measures, total quality management and organizational performance , 1997 .

[44]  H. Kevin Vaziri Questions to answer before benchmarking , 1993 .

[45]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. , 1962 .

[46]  Ram Subramanian,et al.  Organizational Determinants of Exporting: Conceptual, Methodological, and Empirical Insights , 1998 .

[47]  Donna M. Randall,et al.  The consequences of organizational commitment: Methodological investigation , 1990 .

[48]  John A. Pearce,et al.  A measure of ceo social power in strategic decision‐making , 1987 .

[49]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[50]  Frederick A. Russ,et al.  Links among satisfaction, commitment, and turnover intentions: The moderating effect of experience, gender, and performance , 1995 .

[51]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment , 1990 .

[52]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Total Quality Management and the Choice of Information and Reward Systems , 1995 .

[53]  Patricia J. Daugherty,et al.  BENCHMARKING PROGRAMS: OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENHANCING PERFORMANCE , 1995 .

[54]  Matthew Hinton,et al.  Best practice benchmarking in the UK , 2000 .

[55]  Kate Blackmon,et al.  Benchmarking and operational performance: some empirical results , 1997 .

[56]  Judith R. Blau,et al.  Ideas, Complexity, and Innovation. , 1979 .