Fit to diastolic arterial pressure by third-order lumped model yields unreliable estimates of arterial compliance.

The pressure pulse contour analysis method uses a third-order lumped model to evaluate the elastic properties of the arterial system and their modifications with adaptive responses or disease. A fundamental assumption underlying this method is that the estimates of model parameters (two compliances, an inertance, and a peripheral resistance) obtained from a measurement of cardiac output, and a simultaneous measurement of an arterial pressure, are independent of the pressure measurement site. If true, this hypothesis would provide a minimally invasive method for estimation of arterial compliance. The aim of the present study was to test the validity of this assumption and the ability of the method to assess changes of compliance in response to vasoactive drug administration. In five anaesthetised, open-chest dogs we measured pulsatile pressure and flow in the ascending aorta and pulsatile pressure in the terminal aorta, under basal, vasoconstricted (methoxamine), and vasodilated (sodium nitroprusside) conditions. Model peripheral resistance was assumed equal to the ratio of mean pressure to cardiac output. Estimates of inertance and compliances, and the associated estimation errors, were determined by fitting the model output to either the diastolic portions of ascending aortic pressure, P(adt), or terminal aortic pressure, Ptd(t). Results showed that the assumption of independency of model parameter estimates on the arterial pressure measurement site was not verified. Different images of the vasoactive drug-induced changes in vascular compliance were obtained from fits to P(adt) and Ptd(t). Model parameter estimates were associated with high estimation errors and were very sensitive to the choice of the period of diastolic pressure to be fitted. Model predicted aortic pressure, over the entire heart cycle, did not compare well with experimental ascending aortic pressure. Our results question the reliability of the pressure pulse contour analysis method for evaluating arterial compliance.

[1]  M. G. Taylor,et al.  Alterations with Age in the Viscoelastic Properties of Human Arterial Walls , 1966, Circulation research.

[2]  J. Cohn,et al.  Pressure pulse contour analysis in determining the effect of vasodilator drugs on vascular hemodynamic impedance characteristics in dogs. , 1980, American heart journal.

[3]  D. Detweiler,et al.  Arterial wall properties and dietary atherosclerosis in the racing greyhound. , 1979, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  Dynamic local distensibility of living arteries and its relation to wave transmission. , 1974, Biophysical journal.

[5]  G C van den Bos,et al.  Systemic compliance: does it play a role in the genesis of essential hypertension? , 1984, Cardiovascular research.

[6]  Vascular Dynamics: Physiological Perspectives , 1989 .

[7]  Abraham Noordergraaf,et al.  Reduced Models of Arterial Systems , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  J. Cohn,et al.  Vascular hemodynamic impedance in congestive heart failure. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  T B Watt,et al.  Arterial pressure contour analysis for estimating human vascular properties. , 1976, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  N. Westerhof,et al.  Total systemic arterial compliance and aortic characteristic impedance in the dog as a function of pressure: a model based study. , 1987, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[11]  M. O'Rourke,et al.  Arterial stiffness, systolic blood pressure, and logical treatment of arterial hypertension. , 1990, Hypertension.

[12]  K. Sagawa,et al.  Stroke volume effect of changing arterial input impedance over selected frequency ranges. , 1985, The American journal of physiology.

[13]  N. Westerhof,et al.  An artificial arterial system for pumping hearts. , 1971, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  N. Westerhof,et al.  Pressure and Flow Generated by the Left Ventricle against Different Impedances , 1973, Circulation research.

[15]  K P Brin,et al.  Estimation of total arterial compliance: an improved method and evaluation of current methods. , 1986, The American journal of physiology.

[16]  D. R. Gross,et al.  Evaluation of hypercholesterol diet-induced changes in viscoelastic properties of carotid circulation in pigs. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[17]  D. R. Gross Compliance and Aging , 1989 .

[18]  S M Finkelstein,et al.  Arterial Vascular Compliance Response to Vasodilators by Fourier and Pulse Contour Analysis , 1988, Hypertension.

[19]  T. Brubaker,et al.  Nonlinear Parameter Estimation , 1979 .

[20]  A simple algorithm for defining the mean cardiac cycle of aortic flow and pressure during steady state. , 1985, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[21]  R. Goldwyn,et al.  Arterial Pressure Pulse Contour Analysis Via a Mathematical Model for the Clinical Quantification of Human Vascular Properties , 1967 .

[22]  J. Cohn,et al.  First- and third-order models for determining arterial compliance. , 1992, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[23]  K B Campbell,et al.  Effective distributed compliance of the canine descending aorta estimated by modified T-tube model. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  F. Yin,et al.  Arterial Compliance — Physiological Viewpoint , 1989 .

[25]  R. Cox Pressure dependence of the mechanical properties of arteries in vivo. , 1975, The American journal of physiology.