The carbon footprint and embodied energy of construction material: A comparative analysis of South African BRT stations

This article describes strategic design decisions that architects can make during the initial stages of a project to minimise the use of construction materials, reduce carbon emissions and increase energy efficiency. A proposed prototypical Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) station Switch is used as a case study. The investigation focuses on minimising the use of construction materials through an iterative design and assessment process. This article extends an earlier study which analysed existing BRT stations in South Africa by conducting comparative life-cycle analyses (LCA). The earlier study by Hugo, Stoffberg & Barker (2012) identified a series of guidelines to inform the design of low-carbon and embodied energy BRT stations and determined a specific station, the MyCiti station, as the most efficient in terms of its carbon footprint and embodied energy intensity. As a result, the MyCiti station was identified as benchmark for future LCAs of station designs. The Switch prototypical BRT station is purpose designed for the Tshwane1 context and uses the identified guidelines (Hugo, Stoffberg & Barker, 2012) as well as carbon footprint (CF) and embodied energy (EE) of construction systems and materials as design informants generated from a study conducted by Jones (2011b). These informed material choices, use of low-carbon structural systems and integration of multifunctional station components. A cradle-to-gate2 life-cycle assessment compares the CF and EE of the Switch station and an existing South African precedent, the MyCiti station in Cape Town. The Switch station is 35% and 34% (4.08 GJ/m 2 & 378.6kgCO2/m 2 vs 6.28 GJ/m 2 & 574.7kgCO2/m 2 ) more efficient than the existing MyCiti station, in terms of respective embodied energy intensity and carbon-footprint intensity. This prototype is proposed as a benchmark for prospective life-cycle analyses to inform the material choice and design of future BRT stations in South Africa. Keywords : Bus Rapid Transit stations, carbon footprint, climate change, embodied energy, life-cycle assessment, construction materials

[1]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[2]  Junyi Zhang,et al.  The influence of BRT on the ambient PM10 concentration at roadside sites of Trans Jakarta Corridors , 2010 .

[3]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building , 2006 .

[4]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[5]  Hennie Stoffberg,et al.  Mitigating climate change by minimising the carbon footprint and embodied energy of construction materials : a comparative analysis of three South African Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) stations , 2012 .

[6]  F. Convery,et al.  Using Bus Rapid Transit to Mitigate Emissions of CO2 from Transport , 2008 .

[7]  M Hulme,et al.  Overheated, underpowered. Book review of 'The hot topic: how to tackle global warming and still keep the lights on' by Walker, G. and King, D. , 2008 .

[8]  Craig I. Jones.  Life cycle energy consumption and environmental burdens associated with energy technologies and buildings , 2011 .

[9]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems , 1998 .

[10]  P. A. Pienaar,et al.  Considerations with regard to a BRT for Tshwane , 2007 .

[11]  Leonora Rojas-Bracho,et al.  The impact of a Bus Rapid Transit system on commuters' exposure to Benzene, CO, PM2.5 and PM10 in Mexico City , 2008 .

[12]  Barry N. Taylor,et al.  Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) , 1995 .

[13]  Maria Ramos,et al.  Climate Change , 2009 .

[14]  Brenda Vale,et al.  The Autonomous House: Design and Planning for Self-Sufficiency , 1975 .

[15]  Shenghui Cui,et al.  Carbon footprint analysis of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system: a case study of Xiamen City , 2009 .

[16]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts , 2013 .

[17]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in a distribution warehouse , 2011 .

[18]  J. Nelson,et al.  Bus Rapid Transit implementation in Beijing: An evaluation of performance and impacts , 2013 .

[19]  Brenda Vale,et al.  Life cycle analysis model for New Zealand houses , 2004 .

[20]  Jan Marais Hugo.  Switch a BRT terminal as change generator at Pretoria Main Station , 2011 .

[21]  S. Iniyan,et al.  A review of climate change, mitigation and adaptation , 2012 .

[22]  G. Treloar,et al.  Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study , 2000 .

[23]  Hugo Hens,et al.  Life cycle inventory of buildings: A calculation method , 2010 .

[24]  Andrew Schiller,et al.  The vulnerability of global cities to climate hazards , 2007 .

[25]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle environmental assessment of an educational building in Northern India: A case study , 2012 .

[26]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Life cycle energy assessment of a typical office building in Thailand , 2009 .

[27]  Lloyd Wright,et al.  Climate Change Mitigation and Transport in Developing Nations , 2005 .

[28]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .