Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations.

Nowadays, computer simulations have become a standard tool in essentially all fields of chemistry, condensed matter physics, and materials science. In order to keep up with state-of-the-art experiments and the ever growing complexity of the investigated problems, there is a constantly increasing need for simulations of more realistic, i.e., larger, model systems with improved accuracy. In many cases, the availability of sufficiently efficient interatomic potentials providing reliable energies and forces has become a serious bottleneck for performing these simulations. To address this problem, currently a paradigm change is taking place in the development of interatomic potentials. Since the early days of computer simulations simplified potentials have been derived using physical approximations whenever the direct application of electronic structure methods has been too demanding. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) now offer an alternative approach for the representation of potential-energy surfaces by fitting large data sets from electronic structure calculations. In this perspective, the central ideas underlying these ML potentials, solved problems and remaining challenges are reviewed along with a discussion of their current applicability and limitations.

[1]  W. Heisenberg,et al.  Zur Quantentheorie der Molekeln , 1924 .

[2]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[3]  P. Steinhardt,et al.  Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses , 1983 .

[4]  J. U. Thomsen,et al.  Pattern recognition of the 1H NMR spectra of sugar alditols using a neural network , 1989 .

[5]  J. Tersoff,et al.  Modeling solid-state chemistry: Interatomic potentials for multicomponent systems. , 1989, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[6]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks , 1991, Neural Networks.

[7]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1992, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[8]  J. Zupan,et al.  Neural Networks in Chemistry , 1993 .

[9]  Bobby G. Sumpter,et al.  Theory and Applications of Neural Computing in Chemical Science , 1994 .

[10]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Neural network models of potential energy surfaces , 1995 .

[11]  Kohn,et al.  Density functional and density matrix method scaling linearly with the number of atoms. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[12]  Kersti Hermansson,et al.  Representation of Intermolecular Potential Functions by Neural Networks , 1998 .

[13]  Steven Hobday,et al.  Applications of neural networks to fitting interatomic potential functions , 1999 .

[14]  George C. Schatz,et al.  A local interpolation scheme using no derivatives in quantum-chemical calculations , 1999 .

[15]  Walter Cedeño,et al.  On the Use of Neural Network Ensembles in QSAR and QSPR , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[16]  F. Allen The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section B, Structural science.

[17]  Matthias Keil,et al.  Pattern recognition strategies for molecular surfaces: III. Binding site prediction with a neural network , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  A. Gross,et al.  Representing high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces for reactions at surfaces by neural networks , 2004 .

[19]  Sergei Manzhos,et al.  A random-sampling high dimensional model representation neural network for building potential energy surfaces. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Computing Free Energies and Accelerating Rare Events with Metadynamics , 2006 .

[21]  T. Carrington,et al.  A nested molecule-independent neural network approach for high-quality potential fits. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[22]  J. Behler,et al.  Representing molecule-surface interactions with symmetry-adapted neural networks. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[23]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[24]  Paul L. A. Popelier,et al.  A polarizable high-rank quantum topological electrostatic potential developed using neural networks: Molecular dynamics simulations on the hydrogen fluoride dimer , 2007 .

[25]  Joel M. Bowman,et al.  Permutationally invariant potential energy surfaces in high dimensionality , 2009 .

[26]  Douglas B Kell,et al.  Optimal construction of a fast and accurate polarisable water potential based on multipole moments trained by machine learning. , 2009, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[27]  R. Kondor,et al.  Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[28]  A. Oganov,et al.  Crystal fingerprint space--a novel paradigm for studying crystal-structure sets. , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[29]  P. Popelier,et al.  Potential energy surfaces fitted by artificial neural networks. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[30]  Nongnuch Artrith,et al.  High-dimensional neural-network potentials for multicomponent systems: Applications to zinc oxide , 2011 .

[31]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Nucleation mechanism for the direct graphite-to-diamond phase transition. , 2011, Nature materials.

[32]  J. Behler Atom-centered symmetry functions for constructing high-dimensional neural network potentials. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  Roman M. Balabin,et al.  Support vector machine regression (LS-SVM)--an alternative to artificial neural networks (ANNs) for the analysis of quantum chemistry data? , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[34]  J. Behler Neural network potential-energy surfaces in chemistry: a tool for large-scale simulations. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[35]  J. Behler,et al.  Construction of high-dimensional neural network potentials using environment-dependent atom pairs. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[36]  K. Müller,et al.  Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[37]  Jörg Behler,et al.  Thermal transport in phase-change materials from atomistic simulations , 2012 .

[38]  Christoph Dellago,et al.  Neural networks for local structure detection in polymorphic systems. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[39]  Sanguthevar Rajasekaran,et al.  Accelerating materials property predictions using machine learning , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[40]  R. Kondor,et al.  On representing chemical environments , 2012, 1209.3140.

[41]  Jörg Behler,et al.  Next generation interatomic potentials for condensed systems , 2014 .

[42]  J Behler,et al.  Representing potential energy surfaces by high-dimensional neural network potentials , 2014, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[43]  Nongnuch Artrith,et al.  Understanding the composition and activity of electrocatalytic nanoalloys in aqueous solvents: a combination of DFT and accurate neural network potentials. , 2014, Nano letters.

[44]  K. Müller,et al.  Machine Learning Predictions of Molecular Properties: Accurate Many-Body Potentials and Nonlocality in Chemical Space , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[45]  Zhenwei Li,et al.  Molecular dynamics with on-the-fly machine learning of quantum-mechanical forces. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[46]  Gábor Csányi,et al.  Gaussian approximation potentials: A brief tutorial introduction , 2015, 1502.01366.

[47]  Matthias Rupp,et al.  Machine learning for quantum mechanics in a nutshell , 2015 .

[48]  Christian Trott,et al.  Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[49]  J. Vybíral,et al.  Big data of materials science: critical role of the descriptor. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[50]  Jörg Behler,et al.  Constructing high‐dimensional neural network potentials: A tutorial review , 2015 .

[51]  Stefan Goedecker,et al.  Interatomic potentials for ionic systems with density functional accuracy based on charge densities obtained by a neural network , 2015, 1501.07344.

[52]  M. Rupp,et al.  Machine Learning for Quantum Mechanical Properties of Atoms in Molecules , 2015, 1505.00350.

[53]  Jörg Behler,et al.  Concentration-Dependent Proton Transfer Mechanisms in Aqueous NaOH Solutions: From Acceptor-Driven to Donor-Driven and Back. , 2016, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[54]  Ali Sadeghi,et al.  A fingerprint based metric for measuring similarities of crystalline structures. , 2015, The Journal of chemical physics.

[55]  S. Ong,et al.  New opportunities for materials informatics: Resources and data mining techniques for uncovering hidden relationships , 2016 .

[56]  T. Morawietz,et al.  How van der Waals interactions determine the unique properties of water , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Yang Shao-Horn,et al.  Elucidating the Nature of the Active Phase in Copper/Ceria Catalysts for CO Oxidation , 2016 .

[58]  Jörg Behler,et al.  Neural network molecular dynamics simulations of solid-liquid interfaces: water at low-index copper surfaces. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[59]  Gábor Csányi,et al.  Comparing molecules and solids across structural and alchemical space. , 2015, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[60]  Christopher M Wolverton,et al.  Atomistic calculations and materials informatics: A review , 2017 .