Proper Proxy Scoring Rules

Proper scoring rules can be used to incentivize a forecaster to truthfully report her private beliefs about the probabilities of future events and to evaluate the relative accuracy of forecasters. While standard scoring rules can score forecasts only once the associated events have been resolved, many applications would benefit from instant access to proper scores. In forecast aggregation, for example, it is known that using weighted averages, where more weight is put on more accurate forecasters, outperforms simple averaging of forecasts. We introduce proxy scoring rules, which generalize proper scoring rules and, given access to an appropriate proxy, allow for immediate scoring of probabilistic forecasts. In particular, we suggest a proxy-scoring generalization of the popular quadratic scoring rule, and characterize its incentive and accuracy evaluation properties theoretically. Moreover, we thoroughly evaluate it experimentally using data from a large real world geopolitical forecasting tournament, and show that it is competitive with proper scoring rules when the number of questions is small.

[1]  Sanmay Das,et al.  Trading on a Rigged Game: Outcome Manipulation in Prediction Markets , 2016, IJCAI.

[2]  Yiling Chen,et al.  Output Agreement Mechanisms and Common Knowledge , 2014, HCOMP.

[3]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Eliciting properties of probability distributions , 2008, EC '08.

[4]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Measuring Performance of Peer Prediction Mechanisms Using Replicator Dynamics , 2016, IJCAI.

[5]  G. Brier VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY , 1950 .

[6]  Radu Jurca,et al.  TRUTHFUL REPUTATION MECHANISMS FOR ONLINE SYSTEMS , 2007 .

[7]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling , 2012, Psychological science.

[8]  D. Prelec A Bayesian Truth Serum for Subjective Data , 2004, Science.

[9]  Ian A. Kash,et al.  General Truthfulness Characterizations Via Convex Analysis , 2012, WINE.

[10]  Natalia Rigol Essays on the design and targeting of financial products : evidence from field experiments in India , 2016 .

[11]  L. J. Savage Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations , 1971 .

[12]  A. Raftery,et al.  Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation , 2007 .

[13]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Two Reasons to Make Aggregated Probability Forecasts More Extreme , 2014, Decis. Anal..

[14]  David C. Parkes,et al.  A Robust Bayesian Truth Serum for Small Populations , 2012, AAAI.

[15]  R. Selten Axiomatic Characterization of the Quadratic Scoring Rule , 1998 .

[16]  Boi Faltings,et al.  A Robust Bayesian Truth Serum for Non-Binary Signals , 2013, AAAI.

[17]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Eliciting Informative Feedback: The Peer-Prediction Method , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Jens Witkowski Robust peer prediction mechanisms , 2015 .

[19]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Distilling the Wisdom of Crowds: Prediction Markets versus Prediction Polls , 2017 .

[20]  Anirban Dasgupta,et al.  Crowdsourced judgement elicitation with endogenous proficiency , 2013, WWW.

[21]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Crowdsourced Outcome Determination in Prediction Markets , 2017, AAAI.

[22]  Ryan P. Adams,et al.  Trick or treat: putting peer prediction to the test , 2014 .