Conditional expectation for evaluation of risk groundwater flow and solute transport: one-dimensional analysis

Abstract A one-dimensional groundwater transport equation with two uncertain parameters, groundwater velocity and longitudinal dispersivity, is investigated in this paper. The analytical uncertainty of the predicted contaminant concentration is derived by the first-order mean-centered uncertainty analysis. The risk of the contaminant transport is defined as the probability that the concentration exceeds a maximum acceptable upper limit. Five probability density functions including the normal, lognormal, gamma, Gumbel, and Weibull distributions are chosen as the models for predicting the concentration distribution. The risk for each distribution is derived analytically based on the conditional probability. The mean risk and confidence interval are then computed by Monte Carlo simulation where the groundwater velocity and longitudinal dispersivity are assumed to be lognormally and normally distributed, respectively. Results from the conditional expectation of an assumed damage function show that the unconditional expectation generally underestimates the damage for low risk events. It is found from the sensitivity analysis that the mean longitudinal dispersivity is the most sensitive parameter and the variance of longitudinal dispersivity is the least sensitive one among those distribution models except the gamma and Weibull distributions.

[1]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY UNDER INCOMPLETE PROBABILITY INFORMATION , 1986 .

[2]  Z. Kabala,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of flow in unsaturated heterogeneous porous media: Theory, numerical model, and its verification , 1990 .

[3]  Yeou-Koung Tung,et al.  Multi-objective stochastic groundwater management of nonuniform, homogeneous aquifers , 1987 .

[4]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow part: 1. Mathematical development , 1981 .

[5]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain: 2. Two‐dimensional simulations , 1979 .

[6]  Ben Chie Yen Engineering Approaches to Risk and Reliability Analysis , 1989 .

[7]  R. W. Andrews,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Steady State Groundwater Flow Using Adjoint Operators , 1985 .

[8]  W. Ott A physical explanation of the lognormality of pollutant concentrations. , 1990, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  An analysis of flood levee reliability , 1977 .

[10]  M. Shinozuka Basic Analysis of Structural Safety , 1983 .

[11]  D. H. Moreau,et al.  Strategies for water quality monitoring , 1975 .

[12]  Jay L. Devore,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences , 1982 .

[13]  David A. Moser,et al.  Risk Analysis of Dam Failure and Extreme Floods , 1989 .

[14]  K. Apt Applicability of the Weibull distribution function to atmospheric radioactivity data , 1976 .

[15]  R. Freeze A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of one‐dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media , 1975 .

[16]  Alfredo Ang H.-S.,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, vol i : basic principles , 1979 .

[17]  Kailash C. Kapur,et al.  Reliability in engineering design , 1977 .

[18]  L. Mays,et al.  Hydrosystems engineering and management , 1991 .

[19]  B. Brookes,et al.  Statistical Theory of Extreme Values and Some Practical Applications , 1955, The Mathematical Gazette.

[20]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic analysis of spatial variability in subsurface flows: 1. Comparison of one‐ and three‐dimensional flows , 1978 .

[21]  Eugene Z. Stakhiv,et al.  Risk Analysis and Management of Natural and Man-made Hazards , 1989 .

[22]  Panos G. Georgopoulos,et al.  Statistical distributions of air pollutant concentrations , 1982 .

[23]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  First‐order reliability approach to stochastic analysis of subsurface flow and contaminant transport , 1987 .

[24]  J. R. Macmillan,et al.  Stochastic analysis of spatial variability in subsurface flows: 2. Evaluation and application , 1978 .

[25]  Larry W. Mays,et al.  Risk models for flood levee design , 1981 .

[26]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[27]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Statistical Methods In Hydrology , 1977 .

[28]  E. M. Roberts,et al.  Review of Statistics of Extreme Values with Applications to Air Quality Data: Part II. Applications , 1979 .

[29]  Yeou-Koung Tung,et al.  Groundwater Management by Chance‐Constrained Model , 1986 .

[30]  P. Bedient,et al.  Ground Water Contamination: Transport and Remediation , 1994 .

[31]  J. Wolfowitz,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. , 1951 .

[32]  G. Kite Frequency and risk analyses in hydrology , 1977 .

[33]  Larry W. Mays,et al.  Improved risk and reliability model for hydraulic structures , 1983 .

[34]  I. Bogardi,et al.  Choice of distribution functions for hydrologic design , 1978 .

[35]  E. M. Roberts,et al.  Review of Statistics of Extreme Values with Applications to Air Quality Data Part I. Review , 1979 .

[36]  Wayne R. Ott,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS and DATA ANALYSIS , 1995 .

[37]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Probability distributions and their partitioning , 1988 .

[38]  Carl D. McElwee,et al.  Sensitivity of groundwater models with respect to variations in transmissivity and storage , 1978 .

[39]  R. R. Kinnison,et al.  Applied extreme value statistics , 1984 .

[40]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Risk‐based analysis of extreme events , 1988 .