What does it cost to deliver information using position-based beaconless forwarding protocols?

Beaconless position-based forwarding protocols have recently evolved as a promising solution for packet forwarding in wireless sensor networks. Quite a few variants of this class of forwarding protocols have been proposed over the years. One common observation is that they have all been evaluated from the perspective of a single node. Although useful, but a solid understanding of the end-to-end performance is still necessary. In this paper, we shed light on the end-to-end performance of beaconless position-based protocols along three distinct dimensions: energy, latency, and back-off probability. The latter is used as a direct indicator of the network's transport capacity. Consequently, we are able to provide an elaborate response to the question: what does it really cost to deliver a packet in a wireless sensor network using position-based beaconless forwarding protocols? In responding to this question, we highlighted the different performance tradeoffs inherent to beaconless position-based protocols. Furthermore, some operational recommendations are also provided.

[1]  Sang Hyuk Son,et al.  Robust and timely communication over highly dynamic sensor networks , 2007, Real-Time Systems.

[2]  Pedro M. Ruiz,et al.  Beacon-less geographic routing made practical: challenges, design guidelines, and protocols , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Pedro M. Ruiz,et al.  BOSS: Beacon-less On Demand Strategy for Geographic Routing inWireless Sensor Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE Internatonal Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems.

[4]  Sumit Roy,et al.  Clear channel assessment in energyconstrained wideband wireless networks , 2007, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[5]  Eylem Ekici,et al.  Performance Optimization of Interference-Limited Multihop Networks , 2008, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[6]  Laura Galluccio,et al.  MACRO: an integrated MAC/routing protocol for geographic forwarding in wireless sensor networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[7]  Eylem Ekici,et al.  Performance optimization of interference-limited multihop networks , 2008, TNET.

[8]  Rekha Jain,et al.  Wireless Sensor Network -A Survey , 2013 .

[9]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Geographic Random Forwarding (GeRaF) for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Multihop Performance , 2003, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[10]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Wireless sensor network survey , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[11]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Geographic Random Forwarding (GeRaF) for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Energy and Latency Performance , 2003, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[12]  Jörg Widmer,et al.  Contention-based forwarding for mobile ad hoc networks , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.

[13]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Cost- and Collision-Minimizing Forwarding Schemes for Wireless Sensor Networks: Design, Analysis and Experimental Validation , 2009, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..