Epidural anesthesia: views and outcomes of women in labor in a Nigerian hospital.

BACKGROUND Pain during childbirth is a well known cause of dissatisfaction amongst women in labor. The use of epidural analgesia in labor is becoming widespread due to its benefit in terms of pain relief. METHOD After approval of the local Ethics Committee on Research and obtaining informed written consent, 50 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-II consecutive multiparous women in labor requesting pain relief were enrolled in this prospective study. After providing description of the two options of pain relief available to them, they were allocated into two groups according to their request-to receive either parenteral opioid/sedative or epidural labor analgesia. Both groups received analgesia of choice at 4-cm cervical os dilatation. The epidural group received 0.125% plain bupivacaine, while the other group received pentazocine/promethazine intravenously. The time taken to locate the epidural space, catheter-related complications encountered and the amount of intravenous fluid used were documented. RESULT The two groups were comparable in terms of socio-demographic data. The mean duration of the first and second stages of labor, respectively, were significantly shorter in the epidural group when compared with those in the non-epidural group ([P < 0.01] and [P < 0.02]). There was no difference in the rate of cesarean delivery between them - epidural analgesia (32% [8/25]) versus parenteral opioid/sedative (44% [11/25]), (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.19-1.90). The maternal blood loss from delivery was minimal, with no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.27). The neonatal outcome was the same in both groups. Closed questionnaire showed that the overall experience of labor was much better (it was also better than expected) in the epidural group when compared with that in the non-epidural group (80% versus 4%). Eighteen (72%) women had inadequate pain relief in the non-epidural group as compared to 2 (8%) women in the epidural group. CONCLUSION The study shows that epidural labor analgesia is acceptable to women in our setting. More women in the epidural analgesia group were satisfied with the experience of labor than those who did not receive this form of analgesia than among those who received parenteral opioid/sedative.

[1]  Charles Imarengiaye Trends in pain relief in labour: implications for obstetric analgesia service in Nigeria. , 2005, The Nigerian postgraduate medical journal.

[2]  Q. Kalu,et al.  Attitude of Nigerian Mothers to Labour Pain and its Relief , 2004 .

[3]  O. Olayemi,et al.  Attitudes of patients to obstetric analgesia at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria , 2003, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[4]  A. Kaider,et al.  The effect of epidural analgesia on the occurrence of obstetric lacerations and on the neonatal outcome during spontaneous vaginal delivery , 2002, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  E. Hodnett Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  H. Turndorf,et al.  Satisfaction with epidural and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. , 2001, Pain medicine.

[7]  S. M. Ogbonmwan,et al.  Episiotomy in Nigeria , 2000, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[8]  A. Ohlsson,et al.  Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis. , 1998, JAMA.

[9]  M M Cohen,et al.  Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Anesthesia Care: A Review of Current Methodology , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  A. Ross 11 Maternal satisfaction with labour analgesia , 1998 .

[11]  G. Ekman‐Ordeberg,et al.  Obstetric outcome following epidural analgesia with bupivacaine‐adrenaline 0.25% or bupivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil ‐ a prospective randomized controlled study in 1000 parturients , 1998, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[12]  K. Wijma,et al.  Posttraumatic stress disorder after childbirth: a cross sectional study. , 1997, Journal of anxiety disorders.

[13]  Shiv k. Sharma,et al.  Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial of Epidural versus Patient-controlled Meperidine Analgesia during Labor , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[14]  J. Crowhurst,et al.  Opioids in labour—no analgesic effect , 1997, The Lancet.

[15]  E. Lieberman,et al.  Association of Epidural Analgesia With Cesarean Delivery in Nulliparas , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  J. Thorp,et al.  The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  A. Peaceman,et al.  Epidural Analgesia and Cesarean Section for Dystocia: Risk Factors in Nulliparas , 1991, American journal of perinatology.

[18]  T. Philipsen,et al.  Maternal opinion about analgesia in labour and delivery. A comparison of epidural blockade and intramuscular pethidine. , 1990, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[19]  J. Thorp,et al.  The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  A. Hammerle,et al.  Effects of epidural analgesia on plasma catecholamines and cortisol in parturition. , 1986, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[21]  J. Evans,et al.  Maternal Opinion About Analgesia for Labour: A Controlled Trial Between Epidural Block and Intramuscular Pethidine Combined with Inhalation , 1981 .

[22]  J. M. Evans,et al.  Maternal opinion about analgesia for labour , 1980, Anaesthesia.

[23]  A. Ross Maternal satisfaction with labour analgesia. , 1998, Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology.

[24]  G. Chamberlain,et al.  Pain and its relief in childbirth : the results of a national survey , 1993 .