The ideomotor principle and motor sequence acquisition: Tone effects facilitate movement chunking

Participants practiced short sequences of key presses; sequence length and response-effect mapping were the independent variables. Contingent, distinct key-effect relations were contrasted with either contingent but uniform or no response effects. In Experiment 1, tone effects were relevant as response-specific stimuli and also as effects. The sequence length effect for the tones group was reduced. In Experiment 2, participants were informed about the sequences to be executed and then given varying amounts of preparation time before the start signal. A reduction in the sequence length effect was observed, and initiation times and mean interresponse time (IRTs) were generally reduced in the tone group. Preparation time could compensate for some but not all of the latency reducing influence of the tone effects. The results are discussed with reference to ideomotor approaches to motor control, i.e., the notion that actions are represented in sensory format.

[1]  B. Hommel,et al.  Effect anticipation and action control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance Volume Xix , 2001 .

[3]  Sheila Lennon,et al.  Advances in Motor Learning and Control , 1997 .

[4]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Movement control in skilled motor performance. , 1968 .

[5]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  The Influence of Response—Effect Compatibility in a Serial Reaction Time Task , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  M. Ziessler,et al.  Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Willem B. Verwey,et al.  Evidence for a multistage model of practice in a sequential movement task. , 1999 .

[8]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[9]  Howard N. Zelaznik,et al.  Advances in Motor Learning and Control , 1996 .

[10]  W. Kunde,et al.  Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  W. Kunde,et al.  Temporal response-effect compatibility , 2003, Psychological research.

[12]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Motor response programming during simple choice reaction time: The role of practice. , 1995 .

[13]  F. M. Henry,et al.  Increased Response Latency for Complicated Movements and A “Memory Drum” Theory of Neuromotor Reaction , 1960 .

[14]  G. Stelmach.  Information processing in motor control and learning , 1978 .

[15]  Michael Ziessler,et al.  Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning , 1998 .

[16]  J Hoffmann,et al.  Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  A. Gordon,et al.  Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. , 1984 .

[18]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  An auditory analogue of the sperling partial report procedure: Evidence for brief auditory storage , 1972 .

[19]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .