Three-dimensional biomodeling in complex mandibular reconstruction and surgical simulation: prospective trial.

BACKGROUND Mandibular reconstruction is challenging for experienced and resident surgeons. Three-dimensional (3D) biomodeling creates accurate physical models of patients' craniofacial skeletons, which can potentially assist reconstruction. However, this capacity has not been objectively examined. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess 3D biomodels in performing and learning mandibular reconstruction through surgical simulation. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary care academic referral centre. METHODS Ten experienced and 10 naive resident surgeons were asked to bend and fixate a titanium reconstruction plate, for a standardized anterior hemimandibular defect, on a 3D biomodel by freehand or 3D biomodel-assisted means. Participants were randomized to which technique was performed first. Twenty-four to 48 hours later, participants performed the opposite technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Accuracy was measured by anterior mental projection and intercondylar and interangular splay. The results per technique were compared to a complete (control) mandible. The time of reconstruction and usability of each technique, as per an International Standards Organization-based questionnaire, were also determined. RESULTS Three-dimensional biomodel-assisted reconstruction led to plates with statistically indifferent projection and splay compared to the control (p < .05) for both groups. Conversely, freehand constructs significantly deviated in projection and splay for either group (p < .05). No difference in reconstruction time by technique was found (p < .05). Usability favoured 3D biomodel-assisted bending, with significantly higher ratings in either group (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS Three-dimensional biomodels provide a usable and accurate means of mandibular reconstruction for experienced surgeons. Moreover, when used in surgical simulation, they provide an effective tool for teaching residents.

[1]  New transference technique of position of mandibular reconstructing plates using stereolithographic models. , 2009, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[2]  M. Mavili,et al.  Use of Three-Dimensional Medical Modeling Methods for Precise Planning of Orthognathic Surgery , 2007, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[3]  N. Topham,et al.  Using Stereolithographic Models to Plan Mandibular Reconstruction for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  M. Madsen,et al.  Stereolithographic modeling technology applied to tumor resection. , 2005, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[5]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? , 2000, CHI.

[6]  Brett A Miles,et al.  Stereolithography for craniofacial surgery. , 2006, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  S. Lohfeld,et al.  Biomodels of Bone: A Review , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  E. Hannen,et al.  Recreating the original contour in tumor deformed mandibles for plate adapting. , 2006, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[9]  P. D'urso,et al.  Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial. , 1999, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[10]  Jian Sun,et al.  Clinical outcome of dental implants placed in fibula-free flaps for orofacial reconstruction. , 2008, Chinese medical journal.

[11]  H Tideman,et al.  Biomechanics of mandibular reconstruction: a review. , 2010, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  Massimo Robiony,et al.  Feasibility of preoperative planning using anatomical facsimile models for mandibular reconstruction , 2007, Head & face medicine.

[13]  Stefano Filippi,et al.  Accuracy of Virtual Reality and Stereolithographic Models in Maxillo-Facial Surgical Planning , 2008, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[14]  Kevin Fung,et al.  Evaluation of a three-dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: voicing a new direction. , 2010, Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale.

[15]  Adir Cohen,et al.  Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[16]  J. Winder,et al.  Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery. , 2005, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[17]  R. González-García,et al.  Gap ossification in the double-barrel technique for the reconstruction of mandibular defects by means of the vascularized free fibular flap. , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  P. Stoll,et al.  Use of the "double barrel" free vascularized fibula in mandibular reconstruction. , 1998, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[19]  K. Fung,et al.  Introduction of a novel teaching paradigm for head and neck anatomy. , 2010, Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale.

[20]  E. Genden Reconstruction of the mandible and the maxilla: the evolution of surgical technique. , 2010, Archives of facial plastic surgery.