Impact of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

OBJECTIVES This study investigates the effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND Ischemic complications are reduced after PCI when a GPI is added to heparin. However, there are limited data on the safety and efficacy in contemporary PCI. METHODS We used the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry data to assess the association between GPI use and PCI outcomes for acute coronary syndrome between July 2009 and September 2011. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was major bleeding. To adjust for potential bias, we used multivariable logistic regression, propensity-matched (PM) analysis, and instrumental variable analysis (IVA). RESULTS There were 970,865 patients included; 326,283 (33.6%) received a GPI. Unadjusted mortality and major bleeding were more common with a GPI (2.4% vs. 1.4% and 3.7% vs. 1.5%, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). In contrast, GPI use was associated with lower mortality on adjusted analyses; relative risks range from 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50 to 0.97) with IVA to 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.95) with PM. The association of GPI use with bleeding remained in adjusted analyses (multivariable relative risk: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.83 to 2.04; PM relative risk: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.74 to 1.92; and IVA relative risk: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.27 to 2.13). Subgroup analysis revealed enhanced risk reduction with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, high predicted mortality, and heparin-based anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS In unselected acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI, GPI use was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality and increased bleeding. In the modern era of PCI, there may still be a role for the judicious use of GPIs.

[1]  R. Kronmal,et al.  Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. , 1998, Biometrics.

[2]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). , 2006, Circulation.

[4]  Paul R. Rosenbaum,et al.  Matched Sampling for Causal Effects: Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score , 2006 .

[5]  Christopher E. Buller,et al.  2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2008, Circulation.

[6]  B. Gersh,et al.  Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  S. Morgan,et al.  Matching Estimators of Causal Effects , 2006 .

[8]  M. Pencina,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Creatine Kinase-MB Elevation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events (EVENT) Registry , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  J. Newhouse,et al.  Econometrics in outcomes research: the use of instrumental variables. , 1998, Annual review of public health.

[10]  Sebastian Schneeweiss,et al.  The International Journal of Biostatistics Preference-Based Instrumental Variable Methods for the Estimation of Treatment Effects : Assessing Validity and Interpreting Results , 2011 .

[11]  W. Gibler,et al.  Influence of clinical trial enrollment on the quality of care and outcomes for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2005, American heart journal.

[12]  A. Detsky,et al.  Composite end points in randomized trials: there is no free lunch. , 2010, JAMA.

[13]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  K. Alexander,et al.  Changes in glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor excess dosing with site-specific safety feedback in the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines (CRUSADE) initiative. , 2010, American heart journal.

[15]  Epic Investigators,et al.  Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Abciximab and heparin versus bivalirudin for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Califf,et al.  Early versus delayed, provisional eptifibatide in acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  K. Alexander,et al.  Use of anticoagulant agents and risk of bleeding among patients admitted with myocardial infarction: a report from the NCDR ACTION Registry--GWTG (National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry--Get With the Guidelines). , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[19]  M. Mack,et al.  Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  D. Rubin,et al.  Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score , 1985 .

[21]  J. Tu,et al.  Ecological Studies and Cardiovascular Outcomes Research , 2008, Circulation.

[22]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin blockade with eptifibatide in coronary stent intervention: the ESPRIT trial: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001 .

[23]  E. DeLong,et al.  Optimal Timing of Intervention in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines) Registry , 2005, Circulation.

[24]  J. Rassen,et al.  Safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in routine care of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2010, European heart journal.

[25]  Jane A. Linderbaum,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  V. Prasad,et al.  Prespecified falsification end points: can they validate true observational associations? , 2013, JAMA.

[28]  H. White,et al.  Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes , 2002, The Lancet.

[29]  Aziz Ahmed,et al.  Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors with or without thienopyridine pretreatment improve outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in high‐risk patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction—a meta‐regression of randomized controlled trials , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[30]  M. Pencina,et al.  Prognostic impact of periprocedural bleeding and myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention in unselected patients: results from the EVENT (evaluation of drug-eluting stents and ischemic events) registry. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[31]  Adelaide,et al.  Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  Epilog Investigators,et al.  Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  E. Topol Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade , 1998, The Lancet.

[34]  Hani Jneid,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Forc , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  B J McNeil,et al.  Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality? Analysis using instrumental variables. , 1994, JAMA.

[36]  P. Chan,et al.  Survival Benefit With Drug-Eluting Stents in Observational Studies: Fact or Artifact? , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[37]  Christopher E. Buller,et al.  2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[38]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  A. Bavry,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Unfractionated Heparin Plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Revascularization for an Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials Performed With Stents and Thienopyridines , 2012, Clinical cardiology.

[40]  Mandeep Singh,et al.  An updated bleeding model to predict the risk of post-procedure bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report using an expanded bleeding definition from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[41]  Elliott S Fisher,et al.  Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods. , 2007, JAMA.

[42]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Development of a Clinical Risk Algorithm From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[43]  Elizabeth R DeLong,et al.  Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.