The sense of agency during skill learning in individuals and dyads

The sense of agency has received much attention in the context of individual action but not in the context of joint action. We investigated how the sense of agency developed during individual and dyadic performance while people learned a haptic coordination task. The sense of agency increased with better performance in all groups. Individuals and dyads showed a differential sense of agency after initial task learning, with dyads showing a minimal increase. The sense of agency depended on the context in which the task was first learnt, as transfer from joint to individual performance resulted in an illusory boost in the sense of agency. Whereas the quality of performance related to the sense of agency, the generated forces to achieve the task did not. Our findings are consistent with a predictive model account at the perceptual level, such that the sense of agency relies most strongly on sharable perceptual information.

[1]  D. Wegner,et al.  Apparent mental causation , 1999 .

[2]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Bruno H Repp,et al.  Toward a psychophysics of agency: detecting gain and loss of control over auditory action effects. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Bruno H. Repp,et al.  Inferring agency from sound , 2009, Cognition.

[5]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[6]  N. Sebanz,et al.  Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data , 2011 .

[7]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework of perception and action , 2001 .

[8]  W. Prinz,et al.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.

[9]  J. Wishart,et al.  What Is "Probable Error"? , 2022 .

[10]  M. Jeannerod TO ACT OR NOT TO ACT : PERSPECTIVES ON THE REPRESENTATION OF ACTIONS , 1999 .

[11]  Elisabeth Pacherie,et al.  The Phenomenology of Joint Action: Self-Agency vs. Joint-Agency , 2012 .

[12]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  Deceiving oneself about being in control: conscious detection of changes in visuomotor coupling. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  F. Vignemont,et al.  The sense of agency: A philosophical and empirical review of the “Who” system , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[14]  R. Fisher 014: On the "Probable Error" of a Coefficient of Correlation Deduced from a Small Sample. , 1921 .

[15]  ChrisD . Frith,et al.  Perceiving is believing: a Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  P. Haggard,et al.  The role of motor intention in motor awareness: an experimental study on anosognosia for hemiplegia. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  B. Sparrow,et al.  Vicarious agency: experiencing control over the movements of others. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: Virtual lifting and balancing , 2008, NeuroImage.

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention , 2009 .

[21]  Celia A. Brownell,et al.  Early Developments in Joint Action , 2011, Review of philosophy and psychology.

[22]  D. Wegner,et al.  The eureka error: inadvertent plagiarism by misattributions of effort. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Atsushi Sato,et al.  Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency , 2009, Cognition.

[24]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Shared Cooperative Activity , 1991 .

[26]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  The Experience of Agency , 2009 .

[27]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition of agency. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[29]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Cues to Agency , 2013 .

[30]  D. Chalmers Consciousness and Cognition , 1990 .

[31]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  The natural philosophy of agency , 2007 .

[32]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  The origin of voluntary action: history of a physiological concept. , 2006, Comptes rendus biologies.

[33]  Atsushi Sato,et al.  Illusion of sense of self-agency: discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership , 2005, Cognition.

[34]  W. Prinz,et al.  How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[36]  Jurjen Bosga,et al.  Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. , 2007, Motor control.

[37]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  What is Shared in Joint Action? Issues of Co-representation, Response Conflict, and Agent Identification , 2011 .

[38]  M. Tomasello Why We Cooperate , 2009 .

[39]  Peter Carruthers,et al.  The illusion of conscious will , 2007, Synthese.

[40]  C. Frith,et al.  Self-awareness and action , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[41]  D. Wegner,et al.  Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[42]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  M. Jeannerod The mechanism of self-recognition in humans , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  Robrecht P R D van der Wel,et al.  Let the force be with us: dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  E. Pacherie The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework , 2008, Cognition.

[46]  B. Sparrow,et al.  Clever hands: uncontrolled intelligence in facilitated communication. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.