Opening up the future(s) of synthetic biology

Abstract Much of the discussion surrounding synthetic biology involves some degree of speculation about the future. This paper reports on two workshops we held with the aim of ‘opening up’ and exploring possible futures for synthetic biology, one at the Synthetic Biology 4.0 conference (Hong Kong, October 2008) and the other at the BioSysBio meeting (Cambridge, UK, March 2009). We developed an interactive ‘causes and consequences’ exercise for these workshops, with the aim of creating a space for members of the synthetic biology community to discuss issues about the future of the field that they might not regularly explore in their daily work. We analyse the outputs and discussions from these workshops in the light of three key themes: the connections between social and technical issues in synthetic biology, the roles and responsibilities of synthetic biologists in shaping possible futures for the field, and the suitability of this method for opening up discussions about the future.

[1]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity , 1993 .

[2]  H. J. Strauss,et al.  Delphi, political philosophy and the future , 1975 .

[3]  Robin Williams,et al.  Compressed Foresight and Narrative Bias: Pitfalls in Assessing High Technology Futures , 2006 .

[4]  Paul Martin,et al.  The Drugs Don't Work , 2003, Social studies of science.

[5]  Cynthia Selin,et al.  The Sociology of the Future: Tracing Stories of Technology and Time , 2008 .

[6]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Constructive Technology Assessment: A New Paradigm for Managing Technology in Society , 1995 .

[7]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[8]  S. Carr,et al.  Improving the link between policy research and practice: using a scenario workshop as a qualitative research tool in the case of genetically modified crops , 2008 .

[9]  Luis Campos,et al.  That Was the Synthetic Biology That Was , 2009 .

[10]  James Newcomb,et al.  Scenarios for the future of synthetic biology , 2008 .

[11]  P. Pauly,et al.  Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology , 1988 .

[12]  Mike Michael,et al.  Prepublication Copy of , 2009 .

[13]  Mike Fortun,et al.  For an ethics of promising, or: a few kind words about James Watson , 2005, New genetics and society.

[14]  M. Lynch.  Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge , 2000 .

[15]  George Wright,et al.  The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning , 2005 .

[16]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[17]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[18]  Emma Frow,et al.  ‘Can simple biological systems be built from standardized interchangeable parts?’ Negotiating biology and engineering in a synthetic biology competition , 2013 .

[19]  E. Andrianantoandro,et al.  Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[20]  D. Endy.  Foundations for engineering biology , 2005, Nature.

[21]  A. Stirling.  “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .