Statistical Analysis of Coding for Molecular Properties in the Olfactory Bulb

The relationship between molecular properties of odorants and neural activities is arguably one of the most important issues in olfaction and the rules governing this relationship are still not clear. In the olfactory bulb (OB), glomeruli relay olfactory information to second-order neurons which in turn project to cortical areas. We investigate relevance of odorant properties, spatial localization of glomerular coding sites, and size of coding zones in a dataset of [14C] 2-deoxyglucose images of glomeruli over the entire OB of the rat. We relate molecular properties to activation of glomeruli in the OB using a non-parametric statistical test and a support-vector machine classification study. Our method permits to systematically map the topographic representation of various classes of odorants in the OB. Our results suggest many localized coding sites for particular molecular properties and some molecular properties that could form the basis for a spatial map of olfactory information. We found that alkynes, alkanes, alkenes, and amines affect activation maps very strongly as compared to other properties and that amines, sulfur-containing compounds, and alkynes have small zones and high relevance to activation changes, while aromatics, alkanes, and carboxylics acid recruit very big zones in the dataset. Results suggest a local spatial encoding for molecular properties.

[1]  M. Laska,et al.  Olfactory discrimination ability for homologous series of aliphatic alcohols and aldehydes. , 1999, Chemical senses.

[2]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Hitoshi Sakano,et al.  Continuous and Overlapping Expression Domains of Odorant Receptor Genes in the Olfactory Epithelium Determine the Dorsal/Ventral Positioning of Glomeruli in the Olfactory Bulb , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Michael Leon,et al.  Odorants with multiple oxygen‐containing functional groups and other odorants with high water solubility preferentially activate posterior olfactory bulb glomeruli , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  M. Wand Data-Based Choice of Histogram Bin Width , 1997 .

[6]  Linda B. Buck,et al.  Genetic tracing reveals a stereotyped sensory map in the olfactory cortex , 2001, Nature.

[7]  N S Lewis,et al.  Trends in odor intensity for human and electronic noses: relative roles of odorant vapor pressure vs. molecularly specific odorant binding. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Kei M. Igarashi,et al.  Maps of odorant molecular features in the Mammalian olfactory bulb. , 2006, Physiological reviews.

[9]  E. Yaksi,et al.  Electrical Coupling between Olfactory Glomeruli , 2010, Neuron.

[10]  S B Udin,et al.  Formation of topographic maps. , 1988, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  D. Chklovskii,et al.  Wiring optimization can relate neuronal structure and function. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Michael Leon,et al.  Functional mapping of the rat olfactory bulb using diverse odorants reveals modular responses to functional groups and hydrocarbon structural features , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. , 1983 .

[14]  T. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Tuning and Topography in an Odor Map on the Rat Olfactory Bulb , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  C. Sell,et al.  On the unpredictability of odor. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[16]  Michael Leon,et al.  Chemotopic odorant coding in a mammalian olfactory system , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  Richard Axel,et al.  Topographic organization of sensory projections to the olfactory bulb , 1994, Cell.

[18]  David Harel,et al.  A metric for odorant comparison , 2008, Nature Methods.

[19]  Stuart Firestein,et al.  Comparative genomics of odorant and pheromone receptor genes in rodents. , 2007, Genomics.

[20]  Peter Mombaerts,et al.  Odorant Receptor Expression Defines Functional Units in the Mouse Olfactory System , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  W. Stahel,et al.  Log-normal Distributions across the Sciences: Keys and Clues , 2001 .

[22]  L. C. Katz,et al.  Optical Imaging of Odorant Representations in the Mammalian Olfactory Bulb , 1999, Neuron.

[23]  Upinder Singh Bhalla,et al.  Odor representations in the mammalian olfactory bulb , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[24]  John M. Walker,et al.  Comparative Genomics , 2007, Methods In Molecular Biology™.

[25]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[26]  Michael Leon,et al.  Differential specificity in the glomerular response profiles for alicyclic, bicyclic, and heterocyclic odorants , 2006, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Coding of Odors by a Receptor Repertoire , 2006, Cell.

[28]  Ian R. Wickersham,et al.  Cortical representations of olfactory input by trans-synaptic tracing , 2011, Nature.

[29]  B. Nadler,et al.  Global Features of Neural Activity in the Olfactory System Form a Parallel Code That Predicts Olfactory Behavior and Perception , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[31]  Brett A. Johnson,et al.  Is there a space–time continuum in olfaction? , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[32]  Manuel A. Sánchez-Montañés,et al.  Improved Odour Detection through Imposed Biomimetic Temporal Dynamics , 2009 .

[33]  K. Mori,et al.  Odorant Category Profile Selectivity of Olfactory Cortex Neurons , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.