A search for travel-time changes associated with the Parkfield, California, earthquake of 1966

Studies of P-wave travel times at a station within 0.5 km of the ground rupture associated with the Parkfield, California, earthquake of 1966 show no systematic variations for a time period of 7 months before the mainshock to at least 13 months after the event. Sources used include quarry blasts, regional earthquakes, explosions at the Nevada Test Site (NTS), and teleseismic earthquakes. The data from the quarry blasts and regional earthquakes have a scatter of less than + 0.15 see. With suitable source corrections, the scatter in the NTS data can be reduced to about _+ 0.25 see (making the catalog of nuclear explosions potentially useful for monitoring large travel-time changes). The data from teleseismic P waves have much more scatter than do the data from the more local sources. The regional earthquake data (expressed as the time differences between the station near the ground rupture and one farther to the north) show temporal variations, but these variations appear to be due to systematic changes in the hypoeentral locations of the sources rather than changes in the seismic velocity near the recording stations. The quarry blasts are not as subject to this bias and consequently are more reliable for the monitoring of seismic velocity changes. The negative results of our study do not rule out the possibility that a velocity anomaly was associated with the Parkfield earthquake; they do, however, require that any velocity change as large as 15 per cent he confined to a volume that is either less than about 5 km deep by several kilometers wide or that does not coincide spatially with the rupture zone.

[1]  W. Bakun,et al.  The Parkfield, California, earthquakes of 1966 , 1967 .

[2]  T. V. McEvilly,et al.  Stability of P an S velocities from Central California quarry blasts , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  L. Johnson,et al.  Earthquakes of Strike-Slip Type in Central California: Evidence on the Question of Dilatancy , 1973, Science.

[4]  M. E. O'neill,et al.  Aftershocks of the 1966 Parkfield-Cholame, California, earthquake: A detailed study , 1970 .

[5]  R Robinson,et al.  Variation of P-Wave Velocity before the Bear Valley, California, Earthquake of 24 February 1972 , 1974, Science.

[6]  L. Johnson,et al.  Near-field observations and source parameters of central California earthquakes , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  P. Richards,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations in ts /tp and in P wave residuals at Blue Mountain Lake, New York: Application to earthquake prediction , 1975 .

[8]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Source parameters of southern California earthquakes , 1973 .

[9]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Earthquake Prediction: Variation of Seismic Velocities before the San Francisco Earthquake , 1973, Science.

[10]  Eugene Herrin,et al.  Introduction to “1968 seismological tables for P phases” , 1968 .

[11]  C. Cramer,et al.  A search for teleseismic travel‐time anomalies along the San Andreas Fault Zone , 1974 .

[12]  T. Utsu TEMPORAL VARIATIONS IN TRAVEL TIME RESIDUALS OF P WAVES FROM NEVADA SOURCES , 1973 .

[13]  D. Carder,et al.  Trans-California seismic profile-Pahute Mesa to San Francisco Bay , 1970 .

[14]  M. Wyss,et al.  Seismic and aseismic slip on the San Andreas Fault , 1969 .

[15]  Donald L. Springer,et al.  Seismic source summary for U.S. underground nuclear explosions, 1971-1973 , 1971, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  C H Scholz,et al.  Earthquake prediction: a physical basis. , 1973, Science.

[17]  K. Aki Seismic displacements near a fault , 1968 .

[18]  R. E. Wallace,et al.  The Parkfield-Cholame, California, earthquakes of June-August 1966 - surface geologic effects, water-resources aspects, and preliminary seismic data , 1967 .

[19]  J. Healy,et al.  Aftershocks of the Benham nuclear explosion , 1969 .

[20]  M. Wyss Will there be a large earthquake in central California during the next two decades? , 1974, Nature.