Implementation of the C-BiLLT, an accessible instrument to assess language comprehension in children with limited motor and speech function: an international clinician survey

Abstract This study assessed implementation of the Computer-based Instrument for Low-motor Language Testing (C-BiLLT). The C-BiLLT is an accessible language comprehension assessment tool originally developed for children with cerebral palsy and complex communication needs. The purpose of the current study was to understand the clinical contexts in which the C-BiLLT is used in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Norway and assess barriers and facilitators to implementation. An online survey was distributed to rehabilitation clinicians working in the Netherlands, Dutch-speaking parts of Belgium, and Norway. A total of 90 clinicians reported their training in and use of the C-BiLLT; assessed its acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility; and commented on perceived barriers as well as advantages of the tool. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility were all rated highly. The C-BiLLT was used with various populations and age groups but most often with children who were younger than 12 years of age, and those with cerebral palsy. The main implementation facilitator was clinicians’ motivation; the main barriers were related to resources and complexity of cases. Findings suggest implementation of new assessment tools is an ongoing process that should be monitored following initial training, in order to understand clinical contexts in which the tools are being used.

[1]  T. Chau,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Children With Complex Communication Needs and Limited Mobility: A Systematic Review , 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[2]  B. Batorowicz,et al.  Direct assessment of emotional well-being from children with severe motor and communication impairment: a systematic review , 2020, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[3]  E. Jansma,et al.  Factors associated with spoken language comprehension in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review , 2020, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[4]  J. Geytenbeek,et al.  Assessing language comprehension in motor impaired children needing AAC: validity and reliability of the Norwegian version of the receptive language test C-BiLLT , 2020, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[5]  Kristine Stadskleiv,et al.  Cognitive functioning in children with cerebral palsy , 2020, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[6]  Paul A. Harris,et al.  The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[7]  Adam Kirton,et al.  Evaluating If Children Can Use Simple Brain Computer Interfaces , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  K. A. Hagen,et al.  Knowledge translation in child welfare—improving educational outcomes for children at risk: study protocol for a hybrid randomized controlled pragmatic trial , 2018, Trials.

[9]  G. Andersen,et al.  Neuropsychological profiles of children with cerebral palsy , 2018, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[10]  Wenonah N. Campbell,et al.  Supporting evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology: A review of implementation strategies for promoting health professional behavior change , 2017 .

[11]  Caitlin N. Dorsey,et al.  Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures , 2017, Implementation Science.

[12]  C. Wathen,et al.  Integrated knowledge translation: digging deeper, moving forward , 2017, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[13]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  A systematic review of interventions to increase the use of standardized outcome measures by rehabilitation professionals , 2017, Clinical rehabilitation.

[14]  A. Morgan,et al.  Language outcomes of children with cerebral palsy aged 5 years and 6 years: a population‐based study , 2016, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[15]  David McNaughton,et al.  AAC Modeling Intervention Research Review , 2016 .

[16]  C. Kerr,et al.  A systematic review of evidence‐based assessment practices by allied health practitioners for children with cerebral palsy , 2016, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[17]  L. Olswang,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice: Implementation Science. , 2015, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  Andrea Barton-Hulsey,et al.  Early Intervention and AAC: What a Difference 30 Years Makes , 2015, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[19]  J. Becher,et al.  Comprehension of spoken language in non-speaking children with severe cerebral palsy : Development and application of a newly developed Computer-Based instrument for low motor language testing (C-BiLLT) , 2015 .

[20]  M. Roebroeck,et al.  Developmental trajectories of receptive and expressive communication in children and young adults with cerebral palsy , 2014, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[21]  L. Mokkink,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the C-BiLLT: A new Instrument to Assess Comprehension of Spoken Language in young Children with Cerebral Palsy and Complex Communication Needs , 2014, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[22]  Sarah Visintini,et al.  Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving from Evidence to Practice. 2nd ed. , 2014 .

[23]  K. Hustad,et al.  Speech and language development in 2-year-old children with cerebral palsy , 2014, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[24]  G. Dutton,et al.  Identifying and characterising cerebral visual impairment in children: a review , 2014, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[25]  G. Soto,et al.  Facilitating Vocabulary in Toddlers Using AAC , 2014 .

[26]  Kathy S. Thiemann-Bourque,et al.  Support for AAC Use in Preschool, and Growth in Language Skills, for Young Children with Developmental Disabilities , 2013, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[27]  I. Graham,et al.  Integrated knowledge translation , 2013 .

[28]  N. Jetté,et al.  An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2013, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[29]  M. McHugh Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic , 2012, Biochemia medica.

[30]  E. Duncan,et al.  The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[31]  K. Petrides,et al.  An Examination of Relations Between Participation, Communication and Age in Children with Complex Communication Needs , 2012, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[32]  P. Raghavendra,et al.  School Participation and Social Networks of Children with Complex Communication Needs, Physical Disabilities, and Typically Developing Peers , 2012, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[33]  Anke J. E. de Veer,et al.  Successful implementation of new technologies in nursing care: a questionnaire survey of nurse-users , 2011, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[34]  Caroline B. Terwee,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide , 2011 .

[35]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy , 2011, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[36]  J. Clarke,et al.  What is a systematic review? , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[37]  M. Ketelaar,et al.  Development of non-verbal intellectual capacity in school-age children with cerebral palsy. , 2011, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[38]  K. Petrides,et al.  Factors associated with the participation of children with complex communication needs. , 2011, Research in developmental disabilities.

[39]  T. Vik,et al.  Speech, expressive language, and verbal cognition of preschool children with cerebral palsy in Iceland , 2011, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[40]  J. Becher,et al.  Utility of language comprehension tests for unintelligible or non‐speaking children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review , 2010, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[41]  Alicia C. Bunger,et al.  Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda , 2010, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[42]  Margaret K. Mbeseha,et al.  Literacy Interventions for Students with Physical and Developmental Disabilities Who Use Aided AAC Devices: A Systematic Review , 2010 .

[43]  G. Andersen,et al.  Prevalence of Speech Problems and the Use of Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Registry-Based Study in Norway , 2010 .

[44]  Maryann Demchak,et al.  The Use of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Methods with Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities: A Research Review , 2009, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[45]  J. Becher,et al.  Social functioning and communication in children with cerebral palsy: association with disease characteristics and personal and environmental factors , 2009, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[46]  Tom Chau,et al.  A Review of Emerging Access Technologies for Individuals With Severe Motor Impairments , 2008, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[47]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Eye- and Mouth-Opening Movements Replacing Head and Hand Responses in a Microswitch Program for an Adolescent with Deteriorating Motor Condition , 2007, Perceptual and motor skills.

[48]  J. J. van der Meere,et al.  Language and motor speech skills in children with cerebral palsy. , 2007, Journal of communication disorders.

[49]  B. Dan,et al.  A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006 , 2007, Developmental medicine and child neurology. Supplement.

[50]  Kevin Caves,et al.  Access to AAC: Present, past, and future , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[51]  S. Hanna,et al.  Measurement Practices in Pediatric Rehabilitation , 2007, Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics.

[52]  S. Straus,et al.  Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? , 2006, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[53]  M. Tomasello Constructing a Language , 2005 .

[54]  J. Marshall,et al.  Speech and language therapy to improve the communication skills of children with cerebral palsy. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[55]  R. Palisano,et al.  Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy , 1997, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[56]  Y. van der Graaf,et al.  Cerebral Visual Impairment in Cerebral Palsy: Relation to Structural Abnormalities of the Cerebrum , 1994, Neuropediatrics.

[57]  R. Jacob The use of eye movements in human-computer interaction techniques: what you look at is what you get , 1991, TOIS.

[58]  D. Fry,et al.  SPEECH AND LANGUAGE , 1986 .

[59]  Kathryn Drager,et al.  Effects of AAC interventions on communication and language for young children with complex communication needs. , 2010, Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine.

[60]  S. Straus,et al.  Knowledge translation in health care : moving from evidence to practice , 2009 .

[61]  J. Paley Distributed cognition and the education reflex , 2007 .

[62]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .