The Role of Attachment Style in Facebook Use and Social Capital: Evidence from University Students and a National Sample

Social networking sites (SNSs) can be beneficial tools for users to gain social capital. Although social capital consists of emotional and informational resources accumulated through interactions with strong or weak social network ties, the existing literature largely ignores attachment style in this context. This study employed attachment theory to explore individuals' attachment orientations toward Facebook usage and toward online and offline social capital. A university student sample (study 1) and a representative national sample (study 2) showed consistent results. Secure attachment was positively associated with online bonding and bridging capital and offline bridging capital. Additionally, secure attachment had an indirect effect on all capital through Facebook time. Avoidant attachment was negatively associated with online bonding capital. Anxious-ambivalent attachment had a direct association with online bonding capital and an indirect effect on all capital through Facebook. Interaction frequency with good friends on Facebook positively predicted all online and offline capital, whereas interaction frequency with average friends on Facebook positively predicted online bridging capital. Interaction frequency with acquaintances on Facebook was negatively associated with offline bonding capital. The study concludes that attachment style is a significant factor in guiding social orientation toward Facebook connections with different ties and influences online social capital. The study extends attachment theory among university students to a national sample to provide more generalizable evidence for the current literature. Additionally, this study extends attachment theory to the SNS setting with a nuanced examination of types of Facebook friends after controlling extraversion. Implications for future research are discussed.

[1]  C. Hazan,et al.  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  R. Chris Fraley,et al.  Adult Romantic Attachment: Theoretical Developments, Emerging Controversies, and Unanswered Questions , 2000 .

[4]  Marinus H. van IJzendoorn,et al.  Agoraphobia and anxious-ambivalent attachment : an integrative review , 1992 .

[5]  A. Hayes.  Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium , 2009 .

[6]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[7]  Michael A. Jenkins-Guarnieri,et al.  The Relationships among Attachment Style, Personality Traits, Interpersonal Competency, and Facebook Use , 2012 .

[8]  James William Coleman,et al.  Competition and the Structure of Industrial Society: Reply to Braithwaite , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Social networking and adjustments among international students , 2012, New Media Soc..

[10]  S. Kiesler,et al.  EFFECTS OF INTERNET USE AND SOCIAL RESOURCES ON CHANGES IN DEPRESSION , 2008 .

[11]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  Rachel Kowert,et al.  Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst adults , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Me and my 400 friends: the anatomy of college students' Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[14]  N. Ellison,et al.  Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis , 2008 .

[15]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[16]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Online and Offline Social Networks: Use of Social Networking Sites by Emerging Adults , 2008 .

[17]  K. Bartholomew,et al.  Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Doo Young Lee,et al.  The role of attachment style in building social capital from a social networking site: The interplay of anxiety and avoidance , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Social relationships and information dissemination in virtual social network systems: An attachment theory perspective , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  K. Bartholomew.  Avoidance of Intimacy: An Attachment Perspective , 1990 .

[21]  K. Rice,et al.  Attachment to Parents and Adjustment in Late Adolescent College Students , 1995 .

[22]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Exploring similarities and differences between online and offline friendships: The role of attachment style , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Attachment as an Organizational Construct , 1977 .

[25]  Lee P. Stepina,et al.  Hofstede's Country Classification 25 Years Later , 1997 .

[26]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[28]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Daily Well-Being: The Role of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness , 2000 .