Posterior resection via atlantoaxial lamina space without internal fixation for C1-C2 intraspinal tumors: A novel approach

Background: Intraspinal upper cervical C1-C2 tumors pose a challenge in resection. Internal fixation has routinely been used to prevent the occurrence of instability after atlantoaxial laminectomy for resection of C1-C2 intraspinal tumors, that sacrifices the motion of upper cervical spine. We therefore present this report to evaluate the efficacy and safety of one-stage posterior resection of these tumors through the atlantoaxial lamina space without internal fixation. Methods: Ten suitably selected patient with C1-C2 intraspinal tumors were included in this study (period January 2016 to January 2018). All the patients underwent one-stage posterior resection through atlantoaxial lamina space without internal fixation. The efficacy of the procedure was documented by comparing postoperative and preoperative outcome scores [The visual analogue scores (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association scores (JOA), neck disability index (NDI)], cervical physiological curvature and range of flexion-extension. Safety was assessed by documenting the complications associated with surgery and subsequent sequale. Results: 6 Male and 4 female patients with mean age 36 years (range 17 years to 50 years) underwent total tumor resection through posterior only approach using the atlantoaxial lamina space for the following tumors: 4 neurofibromas, 3 schwannomas and 3 meningiomas. The mean follow-up was 31.2 months (range 24–36 months). These patients’ pathological types included. Postoperative VAS and NDI were lower than those of pre-operation with statistical significance (p < 0.05) while postoperative JOA was higher than that of pre-operation (p < 0.05). The physiological curvature and activity of cervical spine were maintained at latest follow up. Three patients suffered cerebrospinal fluid leakages that was managed consertaviley with no added intervention required. No patient had local recurrence at latest follow-up. Conclusion: One-stage posterior resection through atlantoaxial lamina space without fixation is an effective and safe treatment for the upper cervical intraspinal tumor. In our experience this technique can remove tumor completely and does not cause instability to C1-C2 joint.

[1]  T. Nicholson,et al.  Mnesic imbalance: a cognitive theory about autism spectrum disorders , 2008, Annals of General Psychiatry.

[2]  Zhimin Li,et al.  The Long-term Outcome After Resection of Upper Cervical Spinal Cord Tumors: Report of 51 Consecutive Cases , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[3]  K. Harimaya,et al.  Dumbbell Scoring System: A New Method for the Differential Diagnosis of Malignant and Benign Spinal Dumbbell Tumors , 2016, Spine.

[4]  B. Wang,et al.  Laminoplasty using the Posterior Midline Approach in the Treatment of C1-2 Spinal Tumors. , 2015, Turkish neurosurgery.

[5]  K. Humphreys,et al.  Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G). , 2014, Manual therapy.

[6]  Yong Wang,et al.  Clinical features and surgical procedures of intradural-epidural and epidural cervical dumbbell tumors. , 2013, Chinese medical journal.

[7]  Shaohui Zong,et al.  Treatment Results in the Differential Surgery of Intradural Extramedullary Schwannoma of 110 Cases , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Y. Toyama,et al.  Long-term surgical outcomes of cervical dumbbell neurinomas , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[9]  Tao Xie,et al.  Minimally invasive microsurgical treatment of cervical intraspinal extramedullary tumors , 2011, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[10]  D. Ahn,et al.  The Surgical Treatment for Spinal Intradural Extramedullary Tumors , 2009, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[11]  Kulwant Singh,et al.  C1 and C2 nerve sheath tumors: analysis of 32 cases. , 2009, Neurology India.

[12]  S. Behari,et al.  Surgical approach to C1-C2 nerve sheath tumors. , 2004, Neurology India.

[13]  Y. Toyama,et al.  Surgical Strategy for Cervical Dumbbell Tumors Based on a Three-dimensional Classification , 2004, Spine.

[14]  B. Strömqvist,et al.  Visual Analog Scales for Interpretation of Back and Leg Pain Intensity in Patients Operated for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disorders , 2001, Spine.

[15]  Kazuo Yonenobu,et al.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring System for Evaluation of Cervical Compression Myelopathy , 2001, Spine.

[16]  B. George,et al.  Neurinomas of the first two cervical nerve roots: a series of 42 cases. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.