Comparative analyses of the secondary structures of synthetic and intracellular yeast MFA2 mRNAs.

The overall folded (global) structure of mRNA may be critical to translation and turnover control mechanisms, but it has received little experimental attention. Presented here is a comparative analysis of the basic features of the global secondary structure of a synthetic mRNA and the same intracellular eukaryotic mRNA by dimethyl sulfate (DMS) structure probing. Synthetic MFA2 mRNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae first was examined by using both enzymes and chemical reagents to determine single-stranded and hybridized regions; RNAs with and without a poly(A) tail were compared. A folding pattern was obtained with the aid of the MFOLD program package that identified the model that best satisfied the probing data. A long-range structural interaction involving the 5' and 3' untranslated regions and causing a juxtaposition of the ends of the RNA, was examined further by a useful technique involving oligo(dT)-cellulose chromatography and antisense oligonucleotides. DMS chemical probing of A and C nucleotides of intracellular MFA2 mRNA was then done. The modification data support a very similar intracellular structure. When low reactivity of A and C residues is found in the synthetic RNA, approximately 70% of the same sites are relatively more resistant to DMS modification in vivo. A slightly higher sensitivity to DMS is found in vivo for some of the A and C nucleotides predicted to be hybridized from the synthetic structural model. With this small mRNA, the translation process and mRNA-binding proteins do not block DMS modifications, and all A and C nucleotides are modified the same or more strongly than with the synthetic RNA.

[1]  J. F. Atkins,et al.  A rapid in vitro method for obtaining RNA accessibility patterns for complementary DNA probes: correlation with an intracellular pattern and known RNA structures. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  R. Lührmann,et al.  An in vivo and in vitro structure-function analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae U3A snoRNP: protein-RNA contacts and base-pair interaction with the pre-ribosomal RNA. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  D. Morris,et al.  mRNA metabolism and post-transcriptional gene regulation , 1997 .

[4]  A. Sachs,et al.  Association of the yeast poly(A) tail binding protein with translation initiation factor eIF‐4G. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[5]  Y. Yang,et al.  Interleukin-11 mRNA stabilization in phorbol ester-stimulated primate bone marrow stromal cells , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[6]  M. Rosbash,et al.  Intramolecular structure in yeast introns aids the early steps of in vitro spliceosome assembly. , 1996, RNA.

[7]  J. Harp,et al.  Large-scale production of palindrome DNA fragments. , 1995, Analytical biochemistry.

[8]  K. Gerdes,et al.  Mechanism of post-segregational killing: secondary structure analysis of the entire Hok mRNA from plasmid R1 suggests a fold-back structure that prevents translation and antisense RNA binding. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  M. Kozak.  Determinants of translational fidelity and efficiency in vertebrate mRNAs , 1994, Biochimie.

[10]  M. Hentze,et al.  The Role of the 5′ Untranslated Region of Eukaryotic Messenger RNAs in Translation and Its Investigation Using Antisense Technologies , 1994, Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology.

[11]  M. Weiner,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis of double-stranded DNA by the polymerase chain reaction. , 1994, Gene.

[12]  A. Brown,et al.  Rapid mRNA degradation in yeast can proceed independently of translational elongation. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[13]  O. Nygård,et al.  Probing the structure of mouse Ehrlich ascites cell 5.8S, 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA in situ. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  K. Gerdes,et al.  Mechanism of post‐segregational killing: translation of Hok, SrnB and Pnd mRNAs of plasmids R1, F and R483 is activated by 3′‐end processing. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[15]  R Parker,et al.  A turnover pathway for both stable and unstable mRNAs in yeast: evidence for a requirement for deadenylation. , 1993, Genes & development.

[16]  A. Sachs,et al.  3'-UTR-dependent deadenylation by the yeast poly(A) nuclease. , 1992, Genes & development.

[17]  R. Jackson,et al.  Do the poly(A) tail and 3′ untranslated region control mRNA translation? , 1990, Cell.

[18]  M. Zuker.  On finding all suboptimal foldings of an RNA molecule. , 1989, Science.

[19]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  The a-factor pheromone of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is essential for mating , 1988, Molecular and cellular biology.

[20]  J. Ebel,et al.  Probing the structure of RNAs in solution. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  L. Gehrke.  Preparation of mRNA transcripts for secondary structure analysis using SP6 polymerase, guanylyltransferase, and preparative gel electrophoresis , 1986 .

[22]  G. S. Shelness,et al.  Secondary structure analysis of apolipoprotein II mRNA using enzymatic probes and reverse transcriptase. Evaluation of primer extension for high resolution structure mapping of mRNA. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  M. Rosbash,et al.  mRNA splicing efficiency in yeast and the contribution of nonconserved sequences , 1985, Cell.