Automatic recognition and characterization of different non-parenchymal cells in liver tissue

Understanding how cells form tissues is an essential component in systems biology that involves the generation of tissue models. Generating such a tissue model requires a proper reconstruction of the different cells forming the tissue visualized as fluorescent objects in microscopy images. This is limited by the number of fluorescent markers that can be simultaneously imaged in a tissue sample (up to 4-5 by confocal microscopy). This limitation can be overcome by using automatic algorithms for the recognition of the different cell types without the use of specific markers. In this study, we propose a toolbox of algorithms for an accurate identification, reconstruction and characterization of different cells types in 3D tissue images. We applied our toolbox to the recognition of sinusoidal endothelial cells (SECs), Kupffer and Stellate cells in adult mouse liver tissue. The cell recognition algorithm was based on the morphology, texture and relative localization of the nuclei. The analysis of the most relevant parameters used for cell classification gave new insights into liver cell structure and function. In particular, nuclear shape, distance to cell borders, chromatin texture and proximity to sinusoids were the most important parameters for the non-parenchymal liver cells classification.

[1]  André Huisman,et al.  Discrimination between benign and malignant prostate tissue using chromatin texture analysis in 3‐D by confocal laser scanning microscopy , 2007, The Prostate.

[2]  E. Wisse,et al.  Liver cell heterogeneity: functions of non-parenchymal cells. , 1992, Enzyme.

[3]  Badrinath Roysam,et al.  A multi‐model approach to simultaneous segmentation and classification of heterogeneous populations of cell nuclei in 3D confocal microscope images , 2007, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[4]  Hai-Shan Wu,et al.  Fractal characterization of chromatin appearance for diagnosis in breast cytology , 1998, The Journal of pathology.

[5]  Nacim Betrouni,et al.  Fractal and multifractal analysis: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Jinhui Tang,et al.  Hand-Crafted Features or Machine Learnt Features? Together They Improve RGB-D Object Recognition , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia.

[7]  Huan Liu,et al.  Feature Selection for Classification , 1997, Intell. Data Anal..

[8]  Y. Kalaidzidis,et al.  A versatile pipeline for the multi-scale digital reconstruction and quantitative analysis of 3D tissue architecture , 2015, eLife.

[9]  Heung-Kook Choi,et al.  Grading of renal cell carcinoma by 3D morphological analysis of cell nuclei , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[10]  Fernanda H Sakamoto,et al.  Introduction to confocal microscopy. , 2012, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[11]  Andreas Koschan,et al.  Surface shape description of 3D data from under vehicle inspection robot , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  Kenneth J. Longmuir,et al.  Cellular organization of normal mouse liver: a histological, quantitative immunocytochemical, and fine structural analysis , 2009, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[14]  Raúl San José Estépar,et al.  Shape of caudate nucleus and its cognitive correlates in neuroleptic-naive schizotypal personality disorder , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[15]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Learning Bayesian Network Structure from Massive Datasets: The "Sparse Candidate" Algorithm , 1999, UAI.