Computer-supported collaborative argumentation and fuzzy similarity measures in multiple criteria decision making

Abstract Group decision making is usually performed in the presence of conflicting goals and criteria, brought up by spatially dispersed parties with different backgrounds and interests. Recent advances in information technology and computer science may satisfactorily address a variety of related problems, such as communication among the decision makers and efficient elicitation and representation of the domain knowledge. Furthermore, they may significantly automate the decision making process itself. On the other hand, the inherent uncertainty of the problem advocates the use of approximation models, often coming from the fuzzy sets discipline. This paper presents an integrated framework for multiple criteria decision making among groups on the World Wide Web. The agents involved use a fully implemented argumentative discourse system to pursue their criteria and objectives, the aim being the specification of the desired solution to the problem. The system organizes the collective knowledge in a discussion graph with truth maintenance and consistency checking features. Fuzzy similarity measures are then involved in order to assess alternative existing solutions with respect to the desired one. Scope and purpose We view multiple criteria decision making as a collaborative process, where decision makers have to follow a series of communicative actions in order to establish a common belief on the dimensions of the problem. Such dimensions may concern the choice criteria, the existing or desired alternative solutions, or the objective function, to mention some. This paper presents a framework for multiple criteria decision making among groups. Our approach exploits recent advances in information technology and manages to (i) remove the communication impediments among spatially dispersed decision makers, (ii) efficiently represent the domain knowledge, (iii) develop efficient mechanisms to structure and consistently maintain the decision analysis, and (iv) automate the multiple criteria decision making process per se. The framework is based on a fully implemented system, namely H ermes , which enhances decision making by supporting argumentative discourse among decision makers. The system is implemented in Java and runs on the World Wide Web, thus providing relatively inexpensive access to a broad public.

[1]  Nikos Karacapilidis,et al.  Modeling Negotiations in Group Decision Support Systems , 1998 .

[2]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  Multicriteria Decision-aid , 1993 .

[3]  Roger Hurwitz,et al.  The Open Meeting: A Web-Based System for Conferencing and Collaboration , 1996, World Wide Web J..

[4]  Raymonde Guindon,et al.  Cognitive science and its applications for human-computer interaction , 1988 .

[5]  Arthur M. Farley,et al.  Burden of proof in legal argumentation , 1995, ICAIL '95.

[6]  Marc Roubens,et al.  Fuzzy sets and decision analysis , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Dimitris Papadias,et al.  Hermes: Supporting Argumentative Discourse in Multi-Agent Decision Making , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[8]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[9]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making , 1988, CSUR.

[10]  Hector Geffner,et al.  Conditional Entailment: Bridging two Approaches to Default Reasoning , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[11]  D. Suthers,et al.  Providing Expert Advice in the Domain of Collaborative Scientific Inquiry. , 1997 .

[12]  Paul J. Krause,et al.  Argumentation as a General Framework for Uncertain Reasoning , 1993, UAI.

[13]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[14]  C. Pappis,et al.  A comparative assessment of measures of similarity of fuzzy values , 1993 .

[15]  T. Gordon The Pleadings Game , 1993, ICAIL '93.

[16]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  From ideas and arguments to hyperdocuments: travelling through activity spaces , 1989, Hypertext.

[17]  Roger King,et al.  Computer-Aided Reasoned Discourse or, How to Argue with a Computer ; CU-CS-358-87 , 2013 .

[18]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: a hypertext tool for team design deliberation , 1987, Hypertext.

[19]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Fundamentals Of Argumentation Theory , 1996 .

[20]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[21]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[22]  Eugene C. Freuder,et al.  The Complexity of Some Polynomial Network Consistency Algorithms for Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1985, Artif. Intell..

[23]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[24]  Dimitris Papadias,et al.  Collaborative environmental planning with GeoMed , 1997 .

[25]  C. Pappis Value approximation of fuzzy systems variables , 1991 .

[26]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications , 1993 .

[27]  Gerhard Brewka,et al.  A Reconstruction of Rescher' s Theory of Formal Disputation Based on Default Logic , 1994, ECAI.

[28]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Qualitative Decision Theory , 1994, AAAI.

[29]  Thomas F. Gordon,et al.  Pleadings game - an artificial intelligence model of procedural justice , 1995 .

[30]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge , 1977 .

[31]  Raymond McCall,et al.  JANUS: integrating hypertext with a knowledge-based design environment , 1989, Hypertext.

[32]  Piero P. Bonissone,et al.  A Linguistic Approach to Decisionmaking with Fuzzy Sets , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[33]  Nikos Karacapilidis,et al.  Application of a similarity measure of fuzzy sets to fuzzy relational equations , 1995, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[34]  J. Conklin Designing Organizational Memory: Preserving Intellectual Assets in a Knowledge Economy 1 , 2001 .

[35]  Henry Prakken,et al.  From logic to dialectics in legal argument , 1995, ICAIL '95.

[36]  Michel R. Klein,et al.  Knowledge-Based Decision Support Systems With Applications in Business , 1995 .

[37]  Rami Zwick,et al.  Measures of Similarity between Fuzzy Concepts: A Comparative Analysis , 1987 .

[38]  Gadi Pinkas,et al.  Propositional Non-Monotonic Reasoning and Inconsistency in Symmetric Neural Networks , 1991, IJCAI.

[39]  Donald Ervin Knuth,et al.  The Art of Computer Programming , 1968 .

[40]  B. Baets,et al.  A comparative study of similarity measures , 1995 .

[41]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  Multicriteria Decision-Aid , 1992 .

[42]  José L. Verdegay,et al.  Linguistic decision‐making models , 1992, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[43]  D. Suthers,et al.  Belvedere: Engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. , 1995 .