An Application of the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Analysis to the Selection of a New Hub Airport

The paper illustrates the application of three Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods to the problem of the selection of a new hub airport for a hypothetical European Union (EU) airline assumed to operate within the EU liberalised air transport market. The three MCDM methods used are SAW (Simple Additive Weighting), TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution) and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), and they are applied to a preselected set of alternative airports. The attributes (criteria) are defined to express the performance of particular alternatives (airports) relevant for a Decision-Maker (DM), in this case the EU airline in question. In addition to illustrating the three methods, this application of three different MCDM methods is intended to lead to a preliminary judgment about their usefulness as supplementary decision-making tools for eventual practical use. The example in which seven preselected European airports are ranked according to nine performance criteria, indicates that all three methods, if applied to the same problem and using the same method for determining the importance of the different criteria, produce the same results.

[1]  Milan Janic,et al.  LIBERALISATION OF EUROPEAN AVIATION: ANALYSIS AND MODELLING OF THE AIRLINE BEHAVIOUR , 1997 .

[2]  Gang Yu,et al.  OPERATIONS RESEARCH IN THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1998 .

[3]  Norman Ashford.  LEVEL OF SERVICE DESIGN CONCEPT FOR AIRPORT PASSENGER TERMINALS: A EUROPEAN VIEW , 1988 .

[4]  Joseph Berechman,et al.  An Analysis of the Effects of European Aviation Deregulation on an Airline's Network Structure and Choice of a Primary West European Hub Airport , 1996 .

[5]  Morton E. O'Kelly,et al.  The Location of Interacting Hub Facilities , 1986, Transp. Sci..

[6]  C. Culpin.  The Roman Empire , 1990 .

[7]  D. Stasinopoulos,et al.  THE THIRD PHASE OF LIBERALISATION IN COMMUNITY AVIATION AND THE NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTARY MEASURES. , 1993 .

[8]  D. Stasinopoulos.  The second aviation package of the European Community. , 1992 .

[9]  David R. Graham,et al.  Deregulating the Airlines , 1985 .

[10]  Michael W. Tretheway.  GLOBALIZATION OF THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CANADA , 1990 .

[11]  Turgut Aykin,et al.  Networking Policies for Hub-and-Spoke Systems with Application to the Air Transportation System , 1995, Transp. Sci..

[12]  B. Bowen,et al.  AIRLINE QUALITY RATING , 1991 .

[13]  Dieter Wilken,et al.  Estimating runway capacities of German airports , 1997 .

[14]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Evaluating optimal multi-hub networks in a deregulated aviation market with an application to Western Europe , 2001 .

[15]  Milan Janic.  Air Transport System Analysis and Modelling , 2000 .

[16]  Kenneth Button,et al.  Flying into the Future: Air Transport Policy in the European Union , 1998 .

[17]  R. Stough,et al.  Air Transport Networks , 2000 .

[18]  Clifford Winston,et al.  The Evolution of the Airline Industry , 1994 .

[19]  Mark S. Daskin,et al.  Network and Discrete Location: Models, Algorithms and Applications , 1995 .