Mobile Text Entry

There has been a substantial growth in interest in mobile text entry over recent years, among both researchers and users. Increasingly mobile devices are being used to perform text-intensive applications, such as text messaging, creating a demand for more efficient and easier to use text entry methods. Unlike for desktop computing, no single, standard mobile text entry method has emerged. The diversity of mobile devices makes it unlikely that this will ever occur. Thus, mobile text entry remains a very open area of research, providing a favourable environment for the development of innovative text entry methods. A necessary part of the development of a new mobile text entry method is a comparison of its performance with existing methods. Despite being coinplex and time consuming, empirical evaluations remain the best way to make these comparisons. A review of current best practice for the empirical evaluation of mobile text entry methods is presented, alongside a classification of existing mobile text entry methods. The results of an empirical evaluation of a new mobile phone text entry method called Fastap are reported. The performance of the new method, along with that of the T9 and multi-press with timeout mobile text entry methods, was measured for the entry of four different types of text and with three different levels of user experience. The Fastap method was found to provide the best immediate usability among the three methods and its performance continued to improve as users gained more experience with it. Fastap also performed strongly in the subjective ratings. The results of the evaluation are very positive for the ongoing development of the Fastap interface.

[1]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Cirrin: a word-level unistroke keyboard for pen input , 1998, UIST '98.

[2]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  A Comparison of three Methods of Character Entry on Pen-Based Computers , 1994 .

[3]  Paul Kabbash,et al.  Human performance using computer input devices in the preferred and non-preferred hands , 1993, INTERCHI.

[4]  William Buxton,et al.  User learning and performance with marking menus , 1994, CHI 1994.

[5]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Alphabetically biased virtual keyboards are easier to use: layout does matter , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  P MoranThomas,et al.  The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems , 1980 .

[7]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  LetterWise: prefix-based disambiguation for mobile text input , 2001, UIST '01.

[8]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  Dasher—a data entry interface using continuous gestures and language models , 2000, UIST '00.

[9]  Poika Isokoski,et al.  A Minimal Device-Independent Text Input Method. , 1999 .

[10]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  An empirical investigation of the novice experience with soft keyboards , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[11]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  B. Shneiderman Designing the User Interface (3rd Ed.) , 1998 .

[13]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Measuring errors in text entry tasks: an application of the Levenshtein string distance statistic , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Dan Venolia,et al.  T-Cube: a fast, self-disclosing pen-based alphabet , 1994, CHI '94.

[16]  Rebecca E. Grinter,et al.  Y Do Tngrs Luv 2 Txt Msg? , 2001, ECSCW.

[17]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  The Immediate Usability of Graffiti , 1997, Graphics Interface.

[18]  David Goldberg,et al.  Touch-typing with a stylus , 1993, INTERCHI.

[19]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  The metropolis keyboard - an exploration of quantitative techniques for virtual keyboard design , 2000, UIST '00.

[20]  Ken Perlin,et al.  Quikwriting: continuous stylus-based text entry , 1998, UIST '98.

[21]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  One-Handed Touch Typing on a QWERTY keyboard , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  Poika Isokoski,et al.  Model for unistroke writing time , 2001, CHI.

[23]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Predicting text entry speed on mobile phones , 2000, CHI.

[24]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Text entry using soft keyboards , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[25]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  Typing with a two-hand chord keyboard: will the QWERTY become obsolete? , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[26]  Christina L. James,et al.  Text input for mobile devices: comparing model prediction to actual performance , 2001, CHI.

[27]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speed using a stylus and a soft keyboard , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[28]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[29]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  A Probabilistic Character Layout Strategy for Mobile Text Entry , 1998, Graphics Interface.

[30]  Roope Raisamo,et al.  Device independent text input: a rationale and an example , 2000, AVI '00.

[31]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  KSPC (Keystrokes per Character) as a Characteristic of Text Entry Techniques , 2002, Mobile HCI.

[32]  R. William Soukoreff,et al.  Text entry for mobile computing: models and methods , 2002 .

[33]  Allen Newell,et al.  The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems , 1980, CACM.

[34]  M. F.,et al.  Bibliography , 1985, Experimental Gerontology.

[35]  Toshiyuki Masui,et al.  An efficient text input method for pen-based computers , 1998, CHI.

[36]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[37]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Text Entry for Mobile Computing: Models and Methods,Theory and Practice , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[38]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard , 1999, CHI '99.

[39]  Lee Butts Mobile Phone Text Entry , 2001 .

[40]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The Reactive Keyboard: A Predicive Typing Aid , 1990, Computer.