The equal correlation baseline model for comparative fit assessment in structural equation modeling

In this article I describe and evaluate an alternative baseline model for comparative fit assessment of structural equation models and compare it to the standard “null” baseline model. The new “equal correlation” baseline model constrains all variables to have equal, rather than zero, correlations, whereas all variances are free. The new baseline model reflects the reality of atheoretical background correlation in nonex‐perimental data sets, and it improves the ability of comparative fit indices to distinguish between better and worse target models. It also helps to preserve the statistical link between these indices and the noncentral χ2 distribution. Also, computing the same comparative fit indices using different baseline models will provide more information about model fit than computing multiple comparative fit indices using the same baseline. I also point out some limitations of the proposed baseline model.

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  P. Bentler Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Models , 1990 .

[3]  P. Bentler,et al.  Evaluating model fit. , 1995 .

[4]  Empirical Statistics: IV. Illustrating Meehl's Sixth Law of Soft Psychology: Everything Correlates with Everything , 1991 .

[5]  M. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .

[6]  M. Browne,et al.  Cross-Validation Of Covariance Structures. , 1983, Multivariate behavioral research.

[7]  R. Hoyle Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[8]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications , 1988 .

[9]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[10]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[11]  J. H. Steiger Statistically based tests for the number of common factors , 1980 .

[12]  R. Bagozzi A Prospectus for Theory Construction in Marketing , 1984 .

[13]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[14]  George W. Bohrnstedt,et al.  Use of Null Models in Evaluating the Fit of Covariance Structure Models , 1985 .

[15]  D Kaplan,et al.  The Impact of Specification Error on the Estimation, Testing, and Improvement of Structural Equation Models. , 1988, Multivariate behavioral research.

[16]  John Hattie,et al.  Methodology Review: Assessing Unidimensionality of Tests and ltenls , 1985 .

[17]  P. Meehl Why Summaries of Research on Psychological Theories are Often Uninterpretable , 1990 .

[18]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Mathematica: a system for doing mathematics by computer (2nd ed.) , 1991 .