Collaborative learning and anxiety: a phenomenographic study of collaborative learning activities

Collaborative learning encourages deeper learning, producing significant benefit in learning outcomes. There has been an increasing trend to adopt collaborative activities, due to the expected learning benefits but also because of the expected social benefits and their impact on transition concerns. However, collaborative activities may also introduce additional stress and anxiety for students as they cope with altered participation expectations, and the need to develop collaboration, communication and management skills concurrently with their discipline skills. In this paper we describe a phenomenographic analysis of student's reflections on collaborative activities, including their perceptions of the purpose of such activities, and corresponding behaviours.

[1]  Lecia Jane Barker,et al.  When do group projects widen the student experience gap? , 2005, ITiCSE '05.

[2]  Charles E. McDowell,et al.  Guidelines for the use of pair programming in a freshman programming class , 2002, Proceedings 15th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T 2002).

[3]  M. Sandelowski Sample size in qualitative research. , 1995, Research in nursing & health.

[4]  Robert Leeper Progressive project assignments in computer courses , 1989, SIGCSE '89.

[5]  Nathan Griffiths,et al.  ’ s repository of research publications and other research outputs Students ’ perceptions of the factors leading to unsuccessful group collaboration Conference or Workshop Item , 2018 .

[6]  Mattias Wiggberg Computer Science Project Courses : Contrasting Students’ Experiences with Teachers’ Expectations , 2010 .

[7]  David S. Munro,et al.  Easing the transition: a collaborative learning approach , 2009, ACE '09.

[8]  Helen Sharp,et al.  Disengagement in pair programming: Does it matter? , 2012, 2012 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).

[9]  Mordechai Ben-Ari,et al.  Constructivism in computer science education , 1998, SIGCSE '98.

[10]  E. Cohen Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[11]  Andrew Begel,et al.  Novice software developers, all over again , 2008, ICER '08.

[12]  Shirley Booth,et al.  On Phenomenography, Learning and Teaching , 1997 .

[13]  Judy Kay,et al.  Student satisfaction with groupwork in undergraduate computer science : do things get better? , 2003, ACE.

[14]  Lynda Thomas,et al.  Code warriors and code-a-phobes: a study in attitude and pair programming , 2003 .

[15]  Tero Vartiainen,et al.  Moral conflicts perceived by students of a project course , 2006, Baltic Sea '06.

[16]  Lydia Kavanagh,et al.  Developing and disseminating team skills capacities using interactive online tools for team formation, learning, assessment and mentoring : Final report 2011 , 2011 .

[17]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning , 2006 .

[18]  Geert Hofstede,et al.  National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Research-Based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations , 1983 .

[19]  David Wÿss Rudge,et al.  Guest Editorial: A Review of Research on Constructivist-Based Strategies for Large Lecture Science Classes , 2002 .

[20]  L. S. Vygotksy Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[21]  Andrew Begel,et al.  Pair programming: what's in it for me? , 2008, ESEM '08.

[22]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Situating CoWeb: a scholarship of application , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[23]  Anders Berglund,et al.  Students learn CS in different ways: insights from an empirical study , 2006, ITICSE '06.

[24]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .