Design and Implementation of a Web-Based Collaborative Spatial Decision Support System: Organizational and Managerial Implications

The development of collaborative spatial decision support systems presents a host of challenges, ranging from technical to societal and institutional. Resource managers and environmental planners often need to understand the effect of the distributed and uncoordinated land management practices of individual decision-makers, which in the long run causes significant environmental impact. In many cases environmental planning requires collaborative decision-making tools where complex interacting agents with conflicting goals need to work without any prior idea of the counterpart. This paper identifies research issues on the design and implementation of a Web-based collaborative spatial decision making in the specific context of distributed environmental planning. We demonstrate a Web-based Spatial Decision Support System GEO-ELCA Exploratory Land Use Change Assessment for typical decision-making tasks by urban or municipal planning agencies where resource managers or stakeholders of different interest groups can express their options for future land use changes and assess the resulting hydrological impacts in a collaborative environment.

[1]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[2]  William L. Ury,et al.  Getting to Yes , 2019, Boy on the Bridge.

[3]  H. Raiffa,et al.  The art and science of negotiation , 1983 .

[4]  Roger K. Mosvick,et al.  We'Ve Got to Start Meeting Like This!: A Guide to Successful Business Meeting Management , 1986 .

[5]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer support of groups: theory-based models for GDSS research , 1991 .

[6]  B. Turner,et al.  Land use and land cover in global environmental change: considerations for study , 1991 .

[7]  D. Godschalk,et al.  Using GIS for computer-assisted dispute resolution , 1992 .

[8]  Michael Batty,et al.  NCGIA National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Locational Models , Geographic Information , and Planning Support Systems , 2022 .

[9]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[10]  R. Lake Planning and applied geography: positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems , 1993 .

[11]  Lynn A. Maguire,et al.  Resolving Environmental Disputes: a Framework Incorporating Decision Analysis and Dispute Resolution Techniques , 1994 .

[12]  Marc P. Armstrong,et al.  Requirements for the Development of GIS-Based Group Decision-Support Systems , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[13]  T. Nyerges,et al.  Understanding Collaborative Use of GIS through Social Cognition , 1995 .

[14]  J. Pickles Ground truth : the social implications of geographic information systems , 1995 .

[15]  M. Curry Rethinking Rights and Responsibilities in Geographic Information Systems: Beyond the Power of the Image , 1995 .

[16]  Dimitris Papadias,et al.  Collaborative Spatial Decision Making with Qualitative Constraints , 1995, ACM-GIS.

[17]  E. Sheppard GIS and Society: Towards a Research Agenda , 1995 .

[18]  J. Goss “We Know Who You Are and We Know Where You Live”: The Instrumental Rationality of Geodemographic Systems , 1995 .

[19]  S. Elwood,et al.  How and Why Community Groups Use Maps and Geographic Information , 1998 .

[20]  David A. Bennett,et al.  Exploring the Solution Space of Semi‐structured Geographical Problems Using Genetic Algorithms , 1999, Trans. GIS.

[21]  Steve Carver,et al.  Using GIS on the Internet for Planning , 1999 .

[22]  H. M. Rauscher,et al.  A practical decision-analysis process for forest ecosystem management. , 2000 .

[23]  T. Nyerges,et al.  Geographic information systems for group decision making : towards a participatory, geographic information science , 2001 .

[24]  Daniel Weiner,et al.  Community participation and geographic information systems. , 2002 .

[25]  Thomas Maxwell,et al.  Resolution and predictability: An approach to the scaling problem , 1994, Landscape Ecology.