The Dirt on Coming Clean: Perverse Effects of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of interest can lead experts to give biased and corrupt advice. Although disclosure is often proposed as a potential solution to these problems, we show that it can have perverse effects. First, people generally do not discount advice from biased advisors as much as they should, even when advisors’ conflicts of interest are disclosed. Second, disclosure can increase the bias in advice because it leads advisors to feel morally licensed and strategically encouraged to exaggerate their advice even further. As a result, disclosure may fail to solve the problems created by conflicts of interest and may sometimes even make matters worse.

[1]  K. Kroenke,et al.  A comparison of physicians’ and patients’ attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry gifts , 1998, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[2]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[3]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  What you don't know won't hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games , 2006 .

[4]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size. , 2006, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[5]  Carsten Schmidt,et al.  Disclosing conflicts of interest – Do experience and reputation matter? , 2006 .

[6]  Molly Mercer,et al.  The Fleeting Effects of Disclosure Forthcomingness on Management's Reporting Credibility , 2005 .

[7]  S. Issacharoff.  Conflicts of Interest: Legal Responses to Conflicts of Interest , 2005 .

[8]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[9]  D. Moore,et al.  Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy. , 2005 .

[10]  Christopher Peterson,et al.  Mea Culpa: Predicting Stock Prices From Organizational Attributions , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm , 2004 .

[12]  Joy Peluchette.  Making the Team: A Guide for Managers (2nd edition) , 2004 .

[13]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. , 2004 .

[14]  Don A. Moore,et al.  Self-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest , 2004 .

[15]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  A Review of Experimental and Archival Conflicts-of-Interest Research in Auditing , 2004 .

[16]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[17]  L. O'brien.  HOW TO RESTORE THE FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIP: AN INTERVIEW WITH ELIOT SPITZER , 2004 .

[18]  John C. Coffee,et al.  Gatekeeper Failure and Reform: The Challenge of Fashioning Relevant Reforms , 2003 .

[19]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Making the Team: A Guide for Managers , 2003 .

[20]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. , 2003, JAMA.

[21]  Don A. Moore,et al.  Auditor Independence, Conflict of Interest, and the Unconscious Intrusion of Bias , 2003 .

[22]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[23]  Maggie Turp.  Talking cure. , 2003, Mental health today.

[24]  Elizabeth A. Olson,et al.  Eyewitness testimony. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  D. Moore,et al.  Why good accountants do bad audits. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[26]  Arthur Levitt,et al.  Take on the Street: What Wall Street and Corporate America Don't Want You to Know: What You Can Do to Fight Back , 2002 .

[27]  A. Detsky,et al.  Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. , 2002, JAMA.

[28]  États-Unis.  Bipartisan campaign reform Act of 2002 , 2002 .

[29]  R. Scott Tindale,et al.  Group vs Individual Performance in Mixed-Motive Situations: Exploring an Inconsistency , 2002 .

[30]  Arnoud Boot,et al.  The Many Faces of Information Disclosure , 2001 .

[31]  A. Galinsky,et al.  First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  The Collective Preference for Shared Information , 2001 .

[34]  L S Rothenberg,et al.  Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: Editorial practices and author disclosures , 2001, Science and engineering ethics.

[35]  Ronald A. Dye,et al.  An Evaluation of 'Essays on Disclosure' and the Disclosure Literature in Accounting , 2001 .

[36]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  Everyday Irrationality: How Pseudo- Scientists, Lunatics, And The Rest Of Us Systematically Fail To Think Rationally , 2001 .

[37]  Michael Davis,et al.  Conflict of Interest in the Professions , 2001 .

[38]  Krishna G. Palepu,et al.  Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature , 2000 .

[39]  R. Tindale,et al.  ‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups , 2000 .

[40]  R. Tenery,et al.  Interactions between physicians and the health care technology industry. , 2000, JAMA.

[41]  Andrei Shleifer.  Clarendon Lectures: Inefficient Markets , 2000 .

[42]  A. Stark.  Conflict of Interest in American Public Life , 2000 .

[43]  Spencer F. Tinkham,et al.  The Sleeper Effect and Negative Political Advertising , 1999 .

[44]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The norm of self-interest. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[45]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework , 1999 .

[46]  Dennis J. Devine.  Effects of Cognitive Ability, Task Knowledge, Information Sharing, and Conflict on Group Decision-Making Effectiveness , 1999 .

[47]  J. Payne,et al.  Juror Judgments in Civil Cases: Effects of Plaintiff's Requests and Plaintiff's Identity on Punitive Damage Awards , 1999 .

[48]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[49]  Roni Michaely,et al.  Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations , 1999 .

[50]  M. Brewer.  The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[51]  Ilan Yaniv,et al.  Individual and Group Behavior in the Ultimatum Game: Are Groups More "Rational" Players? , 1998 .

[52]  Colin Camerer.  Prospect Theory In The Wild: Evidence From The Field , 1998 .

[53]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Group Choice in Ultimatum Bargaining , 1997 .

[54]  F. Strack,et al.  Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility , 1997 .

[55]  M. Gunderson.  Eliminating Conflicts of Interest in Managed Care Organizations through Disclosure and Consent , 1997, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[56]  Brian H. Bornstein,et al.  The More You Ask For, the More You Get: Anchoring in Personal Injury Verdicts , 1996 .

[57]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Biased Judgments of Fairness in Bargaining , 1995 .

[59]  David F. Sally.  Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 1995 .

[60]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  The Role of Prior Expectancy and Group Discussion in the Attribution of Attitudes , 1995 .

[61]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[62]  Donna Brazil,et al.  Interindividual-Intergroup Discontinuity in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game , 1994 .

[63]  D. Wegner.  Ironic processes of mental control. , 1994, Psychological review.

[64]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  Robert W. Rutledge,et al.  The effects of group decisions and group-shifts on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic , 1993 .

[66]  R. Scott Tindale,et al.  Decision errors made by individuals and groups. , 1993 .

[67]  R. Sims.  Linking groupthink to unethical behavior in organizations , 1992 .

[68]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950-1990 , 1992 .

[69]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[70]  G. Gigerenzer.  How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristics and Biases” , 1991 .

[71]  Rick H. Hoyle,et al.  Individual-Group Discontinuity as a Function of Fear and Greed , 1990 .

[72]  George Loewenstein,et al.  The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[73]  Rick H. Hoyle,et al.  Individual-group discontinuity: The role of a consensus rule , 1988 .

[74]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[75]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions , 1987 .

[76]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Secondhand information and social judgment , 1987 .

[77]  Linda Argote,et al.  Individual versus group use of base-rate and individuating information , 1986 .

[78]  R. Thaler.  The Psychology and Economics Conference Handbook: Comments , 1986 .

[79]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[80]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[81]  R. Abelson.  Decision making and decision theory , 1985 .

[82]  M. Brewer,et al.  Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[83]  G. Becker,et al.  A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence , 1983 .

[84]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[85]  J. Sobel,et al.  STRATEGIC INFORMATION TRANSMISSION , 1982 .

[86]  Hillel J. Einhorn,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making , 1982 .

[87]  R. Hogarth.  Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. , 1981 .

[88]  Colin MacCabe.  The Talking Cure , 1981 .

[89]  Keith P. Sentis,et al.  Fairness and preference , 1979 .

[90]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. , 1978 .

[91]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence. , 1977 .

[92]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. , 1977 .

[93]  S. Peltzman.  Toward a More General Theory of Regulation , 1976, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[94]  Ebbe B. Ebbesen,et al.  Decision Making and Information Integration in the Courts: The Setting of Bail , 1975 .

[95]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[96]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[97]  David G. Myers,et al.  Enhancement of Dominant Risk Tendencies in Group Discussion , 1972 .

[98]  I. Janis.  Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[99]  George A. Akerlof.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[100]  S. Moscovici,et al.  The group as a polarizer of attitudes. , 1969 .

[101]  J. Stoner.  A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk , 1961 .

[102]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .