Developing populations of software breast phantoms for virtual clinical trials

Virtual Clinical Trials (VCTs) of breast imaging have been used as a tool for the evaluation and optimization of novel imaging systems through computer simulations of breast anatomy, image acquisition, and interpretation. VCTs offer significant advantages over clinical trials in terms of cost, duration, and radiation risk. The performance of VCTs depends on the selection of simulated breasts to represent the population of interest. We have developed a method for selecting populations of software breast phantoms to match the clinical distribution of compressed breast thickness and breast percent density. We extracted the compressed thickness information from anonymized DICOM headers of mammography images from 10,705 women who had their breast screening exams within a year (09/2010-08/2011). Percent density was estimated using an open source software tool. Characteristic clinical sub-populations were identified by performing k-means clustering, and represented by separate sets of phantoms. The corresponding thickness of uncompressed phantoms was selected assuming 50% thickness reduction during mammographic compression. The phantom volumetric density was selected based upon a relationship between mammographic (2D) percent density and volumetric (3D) density, estimated from clinical images. Using a set of 24 representative phantoms, we were able to match the analyzed clinical population completely for the compressed breast thickness, and within two percentage points of the volumetric breast density. Representative phantoms can be used to generate the full population of virtual patients, of a size determined by the power-analysis of the specific VCT, by random variations of the internal phantom composition.

[1]  B. Keller,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case–control study with digital mammography , 2015, Breast Cancer Research.

[2]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Interactions of lesion detectability and size across single-slice DBT and 3D DBT , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Dynamic reconstruction and rendering of 3D tomosynthesis images , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Emily F. Conant,et al.  Volumetric versus area-based density assessment: comparisons using automated quantitative measurements from a large screening cohort , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Nooshin Kiarashi,et al.  Finite-element modeling of compression and gravity on a population of breast phantoms for multimodality imaging simulation. , 2016, Medical physics.

[6]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization. , 2012, Radiology.

[7]  Helena Jernström,et al.  Of cup and bra size: Reply to a prospective study of breast size and premenopausal breast cancer incidence , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[8]  B. Keller,et al.  Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation. , 2012, Medical physics.

[9]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  OpenVCT: a GPU-accelerated virtual clinical trial pipeline for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[10]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Virtual clinical trial of lesion detection in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Jeon-Hor Chen,et al.  Computational simulation of breast compression based on segmented breast and fibroglandular tissues on magnetic resonance images , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.