Assessment of nursing management and utilization of nursing resources with the RAFAELA patient classification system--case study from the general wards of one central hospital.

BACKGROUND RAFAELA is a new Finnish PCS, which is used in several University Hospitals and Central Hospitals and has aroused considerable interest in hospitals in Europe. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The aim of the research is firstly to assess the feasibility of the RAFAELA Patient Classification System (PCS) in nursing staff management and, secondly, whether it can be seen as the transferring of nursing resources between wards according to the information received from nursing care intensity classification. METHODS The material was received from the Central Hospital's 12 general wards between 2000 and 2001. The RAFAELA PCS consists of three different measures: a system measuring patient care intensity, a system recording daily nursing resources, and a system measuring the optimal nursing care intensity/nurse situation. The data were analysed in proportion to the labour costs of nursing work and, from that, we calculated the employer's loss (a situation below the optimal level) and savings (a situation above the optimal level) per ward as both costs and the number of nurses. RESULTS In 2000 the wards had on average 77 days below the optimal level and 106 days above it. In 2001 the wards had on average 71 days below the optimal level and 129 above it. Converting all these days to monetary and personnel resources the employer lost 307,745 or 9.84 nurses and saved 369,080 or 11.80 nurses in total in 2000. In 2001 the employer lost in total 242,143 or 7.58 nurses and saved 457,615 or 14.32 nurses. During the time period of the research nursing resources seemed not have been transferred between wards. CONCLUSIONS RAFAELA PCS is applicable to the allocation of nursing resources but its possibilities have not been entirely used in the researched hospital. The management of nursing work should actively use the information received in nursing care intensity classification and plan and implement the transferring of nursing resources in order to ensure the quality of patient care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Information on which units resources should be allocated to is needed in the planning of staff resources of the whole hospital. More resources do not solve the managerial problem of the right allocation of resources. If resources are placed wrongly, the problems of daily staff management and cost control continue.

[1]  L. Fagerström,et al.  Professional assessment of optimal nursing care intensity level. A new method for resource allocation as an alternative to classical time studies. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[2]  K. Malloch,et al.  Patient classification systems, Part 1: The third generation. , 1999, Journal of Nursing Administration.

[3]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity growth in health-care delivery. , 1997, Medical care.

[4]  K. Eriksson,,et al.  A comparison between patients' experiences of how their caring needs have been met and the nurses' patient classification--an explorative study. , 1998, Journal of nursing management.

[5]  L M Huckabay,et al.  Patient classification systems: the problems faced. , 1981, Nursing & health care : official publication of the National League for Nursing.

[6]  De Groot Ha,et al.  Patient classification system evaluation. Part 1: Essential system elements. , 1989 .

[7]  K Nojonen,et al.  Validation of a new method for patient classification, the Oulu Patient Classification. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  J. Muldoon Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine. , 1999, Pediatrics.

[9]  Brant E. Fries,et al.  Validity and reliability of Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Finnish long-term care facilities , 1999, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[10]  De Groot Ha,et al.  Patient classification system evaluation: Part 2, System selection and implementation. , 1989 .

[11]  C. Mueller The RUG-III case mix classification system for long-term care nursing facilities: is it adequate for nurse staffing? , 2000, The Journal of nursing administration.

[12]  Lisbeth Fagerström,et al.  Determining optimal nursing intensity: the RAFAELA method. , 2004, Journal of Advanced Nursing.

[13]  R. Fetter,et al.  Diagnosis related groups: product line management within hospitals. , 1986, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[14]  Chris Ham,et al.  Improving the performance of health services: the role of clinical leadership , 2003, The Lancet.

[15]  K. Eriksson,,et al.  The patient's perceived caring needs: measuring the unmeasurable. , 1999, International journal of nursing practice.

[16]  W A Bauman,et al.  Diagnosis‐Related Group Refinement with Diagnosis- and Procedure‐Specific Comorbidities and Complications , 1995, Medical care.

[17]  L. Fagerström,et al.  Professional assessment of optimal nursing care intensity level: a new method of assessing personnel resources for nursing care. , 1999, Journal of clinical nursing.

[18]  B. Mark What Explains Nurses’ Perceptions of Staffing Adequacy? , 2002, The Journal of nursing administration.

[19]  Hugh Sanderson,et al.  The development of patient groupings for more effective management of health care , 1997 .