How toddlers represent enclosed spaces

Abstract Recent findings indicate that toddlers can use geometric cues to locate an object hidden in a corner of a rectangular room after being disoriented [Cognition 61 (1996) 195]. It has been suggested that locating the object involves reestablishing one’s initial heading. The present experiments examine search behavior after disorientation. We find that toddlers go directly to a particular corner, indicating that they do not have to reestablish their original heading. It also has been suggested that toddlers ability to use geometric cues is limited to surrounding spaces. We find that toddlers can locate an object from outside as well as from inside a space, although the task is harder from outside. Based on these results, we argue that while toddlers do not represent their position relative to a particular portion of a space, they nevertheless may represent their position relative to the entire space (i.e., outside vs. inside).

[1]  C Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPATIAL LOCATION CODING: PLACE LEARNING AND DEAD RECKONING IN THE SECOND AND THIRD YEARS , 1998 .

[3]  E. Spelke,et al.  Spatial knowledge in a young blind child , 1984, Cognition.

[4]  K. Cheng.  A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[5]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[6]  T. McNamara.  Mental representations of spatial relations , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[8]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[9]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Perceiving Real-World Viewpoint Changes , 1998 .

[10]  E. Spelke,et al.  Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space , 2001, Cognition.

[11]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[12]  I Biederman,et al.  Metric invariance in object recognition: a review and further evidence. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[13]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[14]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Orientation Specificity in Representations of Place , 1997 .

[15]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[16]  M. Tarr,et al.  Differing views on views: comments on Biederman and Bar (1999) , 2000, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  The Coding of Spatial Location in Young Children , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[19]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  The coding and transformation of spatial information , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Irving Biederman,et al.  One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects , 1999, Vision Research.

[21]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[23]  S. Gouteuxa,et al.  Reorientation in a small-scale environment by 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children , 2001 .

[24]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.