White-Box Evaluation of Fingerprint Recognition Systems

Typical evaluations of fingerprint recognition systems consist of end-to-end black-box evaluations, which assess performance in terms of overall identification or authentication accuracy. However, these black-box tests of system performance do not reveal insights into the performance of the individual modules, including image acquisition, feature extraction, and matching. On the other hand, white-box evaluations, the topic of this paper, measure the individual performance of each constituent module in isolation. While a few studies have conducted white-box evaluations of the fingerprint reader, feature extractor, and matching components, no existing study has provided a full system, white-box analysis of the uncertainty introduced at each stage of a fingerprint recognition system. In this work, we extend previous white-box evaluations of fingerprint recognition system components and provide a unified, in-depth analysis of fingerprint recognition system performance based on the aggregated white-box evaluation results. In particular, we analyze the uncertainty introduced at each stage of the fingerprint recognition system due to adverse capture conditions (i.e., varying illumination, moisture, and pressure) at the time of acquisition. Our experiments show that a system that performs better overall, in terms of black-box recognition performance, does not necessarily perform best at each module in the fingerprint recognition system pipeline, which can only be seen with white-box analysis of each sub-module. Findings such as these enable researchers to better focus their efforts in improving fingerprint recognition systems.

[1]  Gian Luca Marcialis,et al.  Performance of fingerprint quality measures depending on sensor technology , 2008, J. Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Charles L. Wilson,et al.  A novel approach to fingerprint image quality , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[3]  Dario Maio,et al.  Improving Fingerprint Orientation Extraction , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[4]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Benchmarking Fingerprint Minutiae Extractors , 2017, 2017 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG).

[5]  Craig I. Watson,et al.  Fingerprint Vendor Technology Evaluation , 2014 .

[6]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition , 2005, Springer Professional Computing.

[7]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  FVC2004: Third Fingerprint Verification Competition , 2004, ICBA.

[8]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Design and Fabrication of 3D Fingerprint Targets , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[9]  Bernadette Dorizzi,et al.  Fingerprint and On-Line Signature Verification Competitions at ICB 2009 , 2009, ICB.

[10]  Xudong Jiang,et al.  Fingerprint quality and validity analysis , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  Hakil Kim,et al.  A Study on Performance Evaluation of Fingerprint Sensors , 2003, AVBPA.

[12]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Fingerprint Presentation Attack Detection: A Sensor and Material Agnostic Approach , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB).

[13]  Elham Tabassi,et al.  Fingerprint Image Quality , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[14]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Fingerprint Quality Indices for Predicting Authentication Performance , 2005, AVBPA.

[15]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Fingerprint Spoof Detector Generalization , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[16]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  3D Whole Hand Targets: Evaluating Slap and Contactless Fingerprint Readers , 2016, 2016 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG).

[17]  Gian Luca Marcialis,et al.  LivDet 2015 fingerprint liveness detection competition 2015 , 2015, 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[18]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  FVC2002: Second Fingerprint Verification Competition , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[19]  Serge J. Belongie,et al.  Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-Time with Adaptive Instance Normalization , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[20]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  A Comparative Study of Fingerprint Image-Quality Estimation Methods , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[21]  Umut Uludag,et al.  Standard Fingerprint Databases: Manual Minutiae Labeling and Matcher Performance Analyses , 2013, ArXiv.

[22]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Gold Fingers: 3D Targets for Evaluating Capacitive Readers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[23]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Fingerprint Image Enhancement: Algorithm and Performance Evaluation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[24]  Rex Black,et al.  Managing the Testing Process: Practical Tools and Techniques for Managing Hardware and Software Testing , 2009 .

[25]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Adaptive flow orientation-based feature extraction in fingerprint images , 1995, Pattern Recognit..

[26]  Yasushi Makihara,et al.  Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[27]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  White-Box Evaluation of Fingerprint Matchers , 2019, ArXiv.

[28]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Fingerprint Spoof Buster: Use of Minutiae-Centered Patches , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[29]  Davide Maltoni,et al.  On the Operational Quality of Fingerprint Scanners , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[30]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Universal 3D Wearable Fingerprint Targets: Advancing Fingerprint Reader Evaluations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.