Perceptually based image comparison

This paper presents a new method for measuring the difference between a distorted image and its original. Many areas of image processing require the ability to compare such images in order to evaluate the performance of a given algorithm. These areas include image restoration and image compression. The standard method currently used is the mean squared error (MSE). It is a simple value to calculate, but in many instances it provides an inaccurate representation of the image's quality. The new metrics described here provide a quantitative measure that more closely corresponds to a subjective assessment.

[1]  Claudio M. Privitera,et al.  Evaluating image processing algorithms that predict regions of interest , 1998, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[2]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Image quality assessment based on a degradation model , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  Perceptual image distortion , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[4]  N. Mackworth,et al.  The gaze selects informative details within pictures , 1967 .

[5]  James E. Fowler Video coding using perceptually weighted vector zerotrees and adaptive vector quantization , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[6]  Andrew K. C. Wong,et al.  Resolution-Dependent Information Measures for Image Analysis , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  Sanjit K. Mitra,et al.  Image Representation Using Block Pattern Models and Its Image Processing Applications , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Timothy N. Topper,et al.  On the informativeness of edges , 1989, Conference Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.