Increase in speech recognition due to linguistic mismatch between target and masker speech: monolingual and simultaneous bilingual performance.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.
[2] Wouter A Dreschler,et al. Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] Jon Barker,et al. The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] Stuart Rosen,et al. Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] R L Freyman,et al. Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] T. Houtgast,et al. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Kristin J. Van Engen,et al. Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[9] Lauren Calandruccio,et al. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] Joan Besing,et al. Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[11] S Buus,et al. Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[12] O. García,et al. Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective , 2008 .
[13] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. , 2002, Psychology and aging.
[14] DeLiang Wang,et al. Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] T. Houtgast,et al. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] A. Arvaniti. Greek Phonetics: The State of the Art , 2007 .
[18] W. M. Rabinowitz,et al. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[19] Lauren Calandruccio,et al. New sentence recognition materials developed using a basic non-native English lexicon. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[20] Andrew Stuart,et al. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[21] Kristin J. Van Engen,et al. Similarity and familiarity: Second language sentence recognition in first- and second-language multi-talker babble , 2010, Speech Commun..
[22] E. Bialystok,et al. Emerging bilingualism: Dissociating advantages for metalinguistic awareness and executive control , 2012, Cognition.
[23] R. Keith,et al. An effect of linguistic experience. Auditory word discrimination by native and non-native speakers of English. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[24] Lauren Calandruccio,et al. The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[25] G. Richard Tucker,et al. Bilingual education in the 21st century: a global perspective , 2011 .
[26] T. Dau,et al. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] E. Peña,et al. Understanding bilingualism and its impact on speech audiometry. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[28] Lauren Calandruccio,et al. Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content. , 2012, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] Richard L Freyman,et al. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Lu-Feng Shi. Perception of acoustically degraded sentences in bilingual listeners who differ in age of english acquisition. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[32] H. P. Fairchild. Greek Immigration To The United States , 2008 .
[33] L L Elliott,et al. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] C. Champlin,et al. Reception thresholds for sentences in bilingual (Spanish/English) and monolingual (English) listeners. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[35] Robert C. Bilger,et al. Standardization of a Test of Speech Perception in Noise , 1984 .
[36] M. Cooke,et al. Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.