Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management scenarios on the small island of Mauritius

The aim of this study was to use the life cycle assessment tool to assess, from an environmental point of view, the different possible municipal solid waste (MSW) management scenarios for the island of Mauritius. The scenarios include landfilling with energy recovery (S1), incineration with energy recovery (S2), composting, incineration and landfilling (S3) and finally composting, recycling, incineration and landfilling (S4). The MSW generated in 2010 was selected as the functional unit. Foreground data were collected through surveys and literature. Background data were obtained from ecoinvent data in SimaPro 8 libraries. The scenarios were compared both through the CML-IA baseline–midpoint method and the ReCiPe end-point method. From the midpoint method, the results obtained indicates that landfilling (S1) has the greatest impact in all the analyzed impact categories except ozone layer depletion and human toxicity, while incineration (S2) has the least impact on almost all the analyzed damage categories except in global warming potential and human toxicity. The collection and transportation of waste has a significant impact on the environment. From the end-point method, S4 reduces the damage impact categories on Human Health, Ecosystems and Resources due to the recycling process. S3 is not favorable due to the impact caused by the composting process. However, it is also very important to emphasize that for incineration, the best available technology with energy recovery shall be considered. It is recommended that S2 and S4 are considered for strategic planning.

[1]  A. Suna Erses Yay,et al.  Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya , 2015 .

[2]  Jurate Miliute,et al.  Application of life-cycle assessment in optimisation of municipal waste management systems: the case of Lithuania , 2010, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[3]  Giovanni De Feo,et al.  The use of LCA in selecting the best MSW management system. , 2009, Waste management.

[4]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment of urban waste management: energy performances and environmental impacts. The case of Rome, Italy. , 2008, Waste management.

[5]  M D Bovea,et al.  Alternative scenarios to meet the demands of sustainable waste management. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Stefan Salhofer,et al.  Landfill modelling in LCA - a contribution based on empirical data. , 2007, Waste management.

[7]  K. Hanaki,et al.  Assessment of the environmental impact of management measures for the biodegradable fraction of municipal solid waste in São Paulo City. , 2003, Waste management.

[8]  Y. Fernández-Nava,et al.  Life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management options: a case study of Asturias (Spain) , 2014 .

[9]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  The holistic impact of integrated solid waste management on greenhouse gas emissions in Phuket , 2008 .

[10]  Mufide Banar,et al.  Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey. , 2009, Waste management.

[11]  Romeela Mohee,et al.  Current status of solid waste management in small island developing states: A review. , 2015, Waste management.

[12]  Mingjiang Ni,et al.  Comparison of municipal solid waste treatment technologies from a life cycle perspective in China , 2014, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.