Evaluation of roundness error using a new method based on a small displacement screw

In relation to industrial need and the progress of technology, LNE would like to improve the measurement of its primary pressure, spherical and flick standards. The spherical and flick standards are respectively used to calibrate the spindle motion error and the probe which equips commercial conventional cylindricity measuring machines. The primary pressure standards are obtained using pressure balances equipped with rotary pistons with an uncertainty of 5 nm for a piston diameter of 10 mm. Conventional machines are not able to reach such an uncertainty level. That is why the development of a new machine is necessary. To ensure such a level of uncertainty, both stability and performance of the machine are not sufficient, and the data processing should also be done with accuracy less than a nanometre. In this paper, a new method based on the small displacement screw (SDS) model is proposed. A first validation of this method is proposed on a theoretical dataset published by the European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) in report no 3327. Then, an experiment is prepared in order to validate the new method on real datasets. Specific environment conditions are taken into account and many precautions are considered. The new method is applied to analyse the least-squares circle, minimum zone circle, maximum inscribed circle and minimum circumscribed circle. The results are compared to those done by the reference Chebyshev best-fit method and reveal perfect agreement. The sensibilities of the SDS and Chebyshev methodologies are investigated, and it is revealed that results remain unchanged when the value of the diameter exceeds 700 times the form error.

[1]  T.S.R. Murthy,et al.  Minimum zone evaluation of surfaces , 1980 .

[2]  M. Kirkbride.  Boulder edge‐roundness as an indicator of relative age: A lochnagar case study , 2005 .

[3]  A. Forbes.  Least-squares best-fit geometric elements. , 1991 .

[4]  A. B. Forbes.  Validation of assessment software in dimensional metrology , 1993, Other Conferences.

[5]  G. Goch,et al.  Tschebyscheff approximation for the calculation of maximum inscribed/minimum circumscribed geometry elements and form deviations , 2008 .

[6]  Maurice G Cox,et al.  Chebyshev best-fit geometric elements , 1993 .

[7]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[8]  M. S. Shunmugam,et al.  Criteria for Computer-Aided Form Evaluation , 1991 .

[9]  Eric R. Marsh,et al.  Precision Spindle Metrology , 2007 .

[10]  Wen-Yuh Jywe,et al.  The min–max problem for evaluating the form error of a circle , 1999 .

[11]  Hichem Nouira,et al.  Investigation of the influence of the main error sources on the capacitive displacement measurements with cylindrical artefacts , 2013 .

[12]  Hichem Nouira,et al.  Concept and architecture of a new apparatus for cylindrical form measurement with a nanometric level of accuracy , 2012 .

[13]  M. S. Shunmugam,et al.  On assessment of geometric errors , 1986 .

[14]  Seung-Woo Kim,et al.  Geometrical tolerances: Improved linear approximation of least squares evaluation of circularity by minimum variance , 1996 .

[15]  M G Cox,et al.  Strategies for testing form assessment software. , 1999 .

[16]  R. Steiner.  History and progress on accurate measurements of the Planck constant , 2013, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[17]  Alistair B. Forbes,et al.  Reference software for finding Chebyshev best-fit geometric elements , 1996 .

[18]  Olivier Gibaru,et al.  A newly conceived cylinder measuring machine and methods that eliminate the spindle errors , 2012 .