Bayesian Networks‐Based Probabilistic Safety Analysis for Railway Lines

A Bayesian network model is developed, in which all the items or elements encountered when travelling a railway line, such as terrain, infrastructure, light signals, speed limit signs, curves, switches, tunnels, viaducts, rolling stock, and any other element related to its safety are reproduced. Due to the importance of human error in safety, especial attention is given to modeling the driver behavior variables and their time evolution. The sets of conditional probabilities of variables given their parents, which permits quantifying the Bayesian network joint probability, are given by means of closed formulas, which allow us to identify the particular contribution of each variable and facilitate a sensitivity analysis. The probabilities of incidents affecting safety are calculated so that a probabilistic safety assessment of the line can be done and its most critical elements can be identified and sorted by importance. This permits improving the line safety and saving time and money in the maintenance program by concentrating on the most critical elements. To reduce the complexity of the problem, an original method is given that permits dividing the Bayesian network in to small parts such that the complexity of the problem becomes linear in the number of items and subnetworks. This is crucial to deal with real lines in which the number of variables can be measured in thousands. In addition, when an accident occurs the Bayesian network allows us to identify its causes by means of a backward inference process. The case of the real Palencia-Santander line is commented on and some examples of how the model works are discussed.

[1]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  A Hybrid Optimization Algorithm with Bayesian Inference for Probabilistic Model Updating , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[2]  J. Doob Stochastic processes , 1953 .

[3]  Francesco Flammini,et al.  Modelling system reliability aspects of ERTMS/ETCS by fault trees and Bayesian networks , 2006 .

[4]  William Marsh,et al.  Generalising Event Trees Using Bayesian Networks with a Case Study of Train Derailment , 2005, SAFECOMP.

[5]  Enrique Castillo,et al.  Timetabling optimization of a mixed double- and single-tracked railway network , 2011 .

[6]  Masaaki Kijima,et al.  Markov processes for stochastic modeling , 1997 .

[7]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  A Markovian–Bayesian Network for Risk Analysis of High Speed and Conventional Railway Lines Integrating Human Errors , 2016, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[8]  Lawrence L. Kupper,et al.  Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers , 1970 .

[9]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  An Alternate Double–Single Track Proposal for High‐Speed Peripheral Railway Lines , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[10]  Achilleas G. Papadimitriou,et al.  Optimizing the Seismic Early Warning System for the Tohoku Shinkansen , 2003 .

[11]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Real‐Time System Identification: An Algorithm for Simultaneous Model Class Selection and Parametric Identification , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[12]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Traffic Estimation and Optimal Counting Location Without Path Enumeration Using Bayesian Networks , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[13]  José Manuel Gutiérrez,et al.  Expert Systems and Probabiistic Network Models , 1996 .

[14]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian Network for Probabilistic Modeling of Tunnel Excavation Processes , 2013, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[15]  Melcher Zeilstra,et al.  Humans as an asset in a system consideration on the contribution of humans to system performance and system safety , 2013 .

[16]  Enrique Castillo,et al.  THE CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS APPLIED TO STABILITY OF SLOPES , 1977 .

[17]  Silvia Royo,et al.  Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo , 2016 .

[18]  Naoto Miyashita 2013 Safety Vision , 2010 .

[19]  Hui Wang,et al.  Bayesian Modeling of External Corrosion in Underground Pipelines Based on the Integration of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques and Clustered Inspection Data , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[20]  Brian Alston,et al.  Guidance on the Preparation of Risk Assessments within Railway Safety Cases , 2008 .

[21]  Jean-Pierre Widmer High-Speed Rail (HSR) , 2002 .

[22]  Nastaran Dadashi,et al.  Rail Human Factors : Supporting reliability, safety and cost reduction , 2013 .

[23]  Hiroshi Fukuyama,et al.  Application of risk assessment method in railway , 2008 .

[24]  Joseph M. Sussman INDUSTRY/ACADEMIC COOPERATION IN TRANSPORTATION: THE PARTNERSHIP OF JR EAST AND MIT. , 1996 .

[25]  Andrew W Evans,et al.  Fatal train accidents on Europe's railways: 1980-2009. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Andrew Ryder,et al.  High speed rail , 2012 .

[27]  J. Wreathall,et al.  HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF RISK ASSESSMENT FOR POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL , 2003 .

[28]  Soshi Kawakami,et al.  Application of a systems-theoretic approach to risk analysis of high-speed rail project management in the US , 2014 .

[29]  Terry Tse,et al.  Practical Risk Assessment Methodology for Safety-Critical Train Control Systems , 2009 .

[30]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Sensitivity analysis in discrete Bayesian networks , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[31]  Youssef Lahrech Development and application of a probabilistic risk assessment model for evaluating advanced train control technologies , 1999 .

[32]  E. Castillo,et al.  Uncertainty analyses in fault trees and Bayesian networks using FORM/SORM methods , 1999 .

[33]  R. I. Muttram Railway Safety's Safety Risk Model , 2002 .