Methodological Quality and Scientific Impact of Quantitative Nursing Education Research Over 18 Months

ABSTRACT The methodological quality of nursing education research has not been rigorously studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality and scientific impact of nursing education research reports. The methodological quality of 133 quantitative nursing education research articles published between July 2006 and December 2007 was evaluated using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). The mean (± SD) MERSQI score was 9.8 ± 2.2. It correlated (p < .05) with several scientific impact indicators: citation counts from Scopus (r = .223), Google Scholar (r = .224), and journal impact factor (r = .21 6); it was not associated with Web of Science citation count, funding, or h Index.The similarities between this study's MERSQI ratings for nursing literature and those reported for the medical literature, coupled with the association with citation counts, suggest that the MERSQI is an appropriate instrument to evaluate the quality of nursing education research.

[1]  Edbert B. Hsu,et al.  Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Educational Intervention Studies , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  J. Olson,et al.  An Inventory of Nursing Education Research , 2005, International journal of nursing education scholarship.

[3]  Darcy A Reed,et al.  An assessment of the methodologic quality of medical education research studies published in The American Journal of Surgery. , 2009, American journal of surgery.

[4]  M. Broome.  Building the science for nursing education: vision or improbable dream. , 2009, Nursing outlook.

[5]  David A. Cook,et al.  Predictive Validity Evidence for Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument Scores: Quality of Submissions to JGIM’s Medical Education Special Issue , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  S. Izumi.  Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation , 2011 .

[7]  David A Cook,et al.  A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: many informative elements missing. , 2007, Medical education.

[8]  R. Levine,et al.  Neurobehavioral Performance of Residents After Heavy Night Call Versus After Alcohol Ingestion , 2005, JAMA.

[9]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[10]  David A Cook,et al.  Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. , 2007, JAMA.

[11]  A. Butler,et al.  The future of nursing. Leading change, advancing health. , 2011, Colorado nurse.

[12]  C. Tanner,et al.  Research in nursing education: assumptions and priorities. , 1987, The Journal of nursing education.