Dynamic small-world behavior in functional brain networks unveiled by an event-related networks approach.

There is growing interest in studying the role of connectivity patterns in brain functions. In recent years, functional brain networks were found to exhibit small-world properties during different brain states. In previous studies, time-independent networks were recovered from long time periods of brain activity. In this paper, we propose an approach, the event-related networks, that allows one to characterize the dynamical evolution of functional brain networks in time-frequency space. We illustrate this approach by characterizing connectivity patterns in magnetoencephalographic signals recorded during a visual stimulus paradigm. When compared with equivalent random and regular networks, the results reveal that functional connectivity varies with time and frequency during the processing of the stimulus, while maintaining a small-world structure. This approach may provide insights into the connectivity of other complex and spatially extended nonstationary systems.

[1]  C. Stam,et al.  Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[3]  E. Bullmore,et al.  A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[5]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[6]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  O. Sporns,et al.  Organization, development and function of complex brain networks , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  A. Vespignani,et al.  The architecture of complex weighted networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Interneuron Diversity series: Circuit complexity and axon wiring economy of cortical interneurons , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Artieda,et al.  High frequency oscillations in the somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP's) are mainly due to phase-resetting phenomena , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[13]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Scale-free brain functional networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[14]  G Tononi,et al.  Theoretical neuroanatomy: relating anatomical and functional connectivity in graphs and cortical connection matrices. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[18]  W. Singer,et al.  Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[20]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.