Mechanical-Analytical Soil-Dependent Fragility Curves of Existing RC Frames with Column-Driven Failures

In seismic risk estimation, among the different types of fragility curves used (judgement-based, mechanical, empirical/observational, hybrid), the mechanical ones have the twofold advantage of allowing a better control over the basic parameters and of representing a validation test of the consistency of empirical/observational ones. In this study, fragility curves of RC frames with column-driven failures are obtained from a simplified analytical pushover method implemented in a simple spreadsheet, thus allowing the user to perform a large number of analyses. More importantly, the proposed method introduces the concept that Limit States at the structural level are obtained consequent to the attainment of the same Limit States at the local level, in the columns’ sections. This avoids using additional criteria, such as interstorey drift thresholds. This simple analytical model allows for rapid development of fragility curves, for any Limit State, of different building typologies identified by a set of global quantities (number of storeys, story heights, number of spans and span lengths) and by a set of local quantities (element sizes, reinforcement, and material properties). It also allows for a straightforward treatment of the influence of the soil class on the fragility curves parameters, which is another critical issue addressed in this work that helps when interpreting some literature results using empirical/observational methods.

[1]  Philippe Guéguen,et al.  Comparison between seismic and domestic risk in moderate seismic hazard prone region: the Grenoble City (France) test site , 2012 .

[2]  F. Meroni,et al.  A Damage Scenario for the 2012 Northern Italy Earthquakes and Estimation of the Economic Losses to Residential Buildings , 2017, International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.

[3]  Paolo Ricci,et al.  Empirical fragility curves from damage data on RC buildings after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[4]  Tiziana Rossetto,et al.  Use of regression analysis for the construction of empirical fragility curves , 2012 .

[5]  G. Manfredi,et al.  Analytical versus observational fragilities: the case of Pettino (L’Aquila) damage data database , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[6]  James Jackson,et al.  Fatal attraction: living with earthquakes, the growth of villages into megacities, and earthquake vulnerability in the modern world , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  Fabio Minghini,et al.  Empirical seismic fragility for the precast RC industrial buildings damaged by the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquakes , 2017 .

[8]  Fabio Di Trapani,et al.  Seismic fragility assessment of infilled frames subject to mainshock/aftershock sequences using a double incremental dynamic analysis approach , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[9]  F. Petrone,et al.  Unified code-compliant equations for bending and ductility capacity of full and hollow rectangular RC sections , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[10]  Maria Rota,et al.  Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves , 2008 .

[11]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large-scale assessment of RC buildings , 2008 .

[12]  G. Verderame,et al.  A CLASS-ORIENTED LARGE SCALE COMPARISON WITH POST-EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE FOR ABRUZZI REGION , 2017 .

[13]  Vincenzo Bianco,et al.  Expeditious seismic assessment of existing moment resisting frame reinforced concrete buildings: Proposal of a calculation method , 2015 .

[14]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Incremental dynamic based fragility assessment of reinforced concrete structures: Stationary vs. non-stationary artificial ground motions , 2017 .

[15]  Timothy J. Sullivan,et al.  Simplified Pushover Analysis of Moment Resisting Frame Structures , 2018, Journal of Earthquake Engineering.

[16]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings , 2006 .

[17]  G. Manfredi,et al.  Observed and predicted earthquake damage scenarios: the case study of Pettino (L’Aquila) after the 6th April 2009 event , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[18]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[19]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data , 2003 .