An efficient tandem affinity purification procedure for interaction proteomics in mammalian cells

Tandem affinity purification (TAP) is a generic two-step affinity purification protocol that enables the isolation of protein complexes under close-to-physiological conditions for subsequent analysis by mass spectrometry. Although TAP was instrumental in elucidating the yeast cellular machinery, in mammalian cells the method suffers from a low overall yield. We designed several dual-affinity tags optimized for use in mammalian cells and compared the efficiency of each tag to the conventional TAP tag. A tag based on protein G and the streptavidin-binding peptide (GS-TAP) resulted in a tenfold increase in protein-complex yield and improved the specificity of the procedure. This allows purification of protein complexes that were hitherto not amenable to TAP and use of less starting material, leading to higher success rates and enabling systematic interaction proteomics projects. Using the well-characterized Ku70-Ku80 protein complex as an example, we identified both core elements as well as new candidate effectors.*Note: In the version of this article initially published online, the GS-TAP tag in Figure 3b was incorrectly identified as a GC-TAP tag, and the email address for material requests (materials@cemm.oeaw.ac.at) was omitted from the methods section. The errors have been corrected for all versions of the article.

[1]  L. Björck,et al.  CHAPTER 9 – Streptococcal protein G , 1990 .

[2]  L. Björck,et al.  Streptococcal protein G. Gene structure and protein binding properties. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  S. Jackson,et al.  The DNA-dependent protein kinase: Requirement for DNA ends and association with Ku antigen , 1993, Cell.

[4]  G J Kleywegt,et al.  Crystal structure of the C2 fragment of streptococcal protein G in complex with the Fc domain of human IgG. , 1995, Structure.

[5]  R. Naviaux,et al.  The pCL vector system: rapid production of helper-free, high-titer, recombinant retroviruses , 1996, Journal of virology.

[6]  G. Nolan,et al.  Episomal vectors rapidly and stably produce high-titer recombinant retrovirus. , 1996, Human gene therapy.

[7]  B. Alberts.  The Cell as a Collection of Protein Machines: Preparing the Next Generation of Molecular Biologists , 1998, Cell.

[8]  CsA-sensitive purine-box transcriptional regulator in bronchial epithelial cells contains NF45, NF90, and Ku. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[9]  B. Séraphin,et al.  A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Lucio Comai,et al.  Functional Interaction between Ku and the Werner Syndrome Protein in DNA End Processing* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Anthony D. Keefe,et al.  One-step purification of recombinant proteins using a nanomolar-affinity streptavidin-binding peptide, the SBP-Tag. , 2001, Protein expression and purification.

[12]  B. Séraphin,et al.  The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. , 2001, Methods.

[13]  M. Yamaguchi,et al.  Nearest neighbour analysis of MCM protein complexes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[15]  G. Pruijn,et al.  Nucleolin associates with a subset of the human Ro ribonucleoprotein complexes. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  K. Terpe.  Overview of tag protein fusions: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems , 2002, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  Nuclear processes controlled by molecular machines , 2002, Genome Biology.

[18]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[19]  M. Cole,et al.  BAF53 Forms Distinct Nuclear Complexes and Functions as a Critical c-Myc-Interacting Nuclear Cofactor for Oncogenic Transformation , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[20]  M. Karin,et al.  ReviewMissing Pieces in the NF-B Puzzle stimulate the migration and maturation of lymphocytes , 2002 .

[21]  G. Superti-Furga,et al.  Rediscovering the sweet spot in drug discovery. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[22]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[23]  G. Casari,et al.  A physical and functional map of the human TNF-alpha/NF-kappa B signal transduction pathway. , 2004, Nature cell biology.

[24]  Charles J. Sherr,et al.  Physical and Functional Interactions of the Arf Tumor Suppressor Protein with Nucleophosmin/B23 , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[25]  Bernhard Küster,et al.  Comprehensive Proteomic Analysis of Human Par Protein Complexes Reveals an Interconnected Protein Network* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  P. Jeggo,et al.  The life and death of DNA-PK , 2005, Oncogene.

[27]  A. Desai,et al.  A Combined Approach for the Localization and Tandem Affinity Purification of Protein Complexes from Metazoans , 2005, Science's STKE.

[28]  Mark C. Fishman,et al.  Pharmaceuticals: A new grammar for drug discovery , 2005, Nature.

[29]  J. Cooper,et al.  The Pleckstrin Homology Domain-Containing Protein CKIP-1 Is Involved in Regulation of Cell Morphology and the Actin Cytoskeleton and Interaction with Actin Capping Protein , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[30]  A. Emili,et al.  Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli , 2005, Nature.

[31]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Reconstruction of cellular signalling networks and analysis of their properties , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  Giulio Superti-Furga,et al.  Charting protein complexes, signaling pathways, and networks in the immune system , 2006, Immunological reviews.

[33]  A. S. Juncker,et al.  A wiring of the human nucleolus. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[34]  M. Mann,et al.  Specificity in Toll-like receptor signalling through distinct effector functions of TRAF3 and TRAF6 , 2006, Nature.

[35]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[36]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.