A low-cost intracellular delivery system based on microbubble and high gravity field

In this paper, we developed a low-cost intracellular delivery system based on microbubble and high gravity field. We successfully delivered FITC-Dextran (40kD) into hard-to-deliver THP-1 cells. The results showed that our method achieved high delivery efficiency up to 80%. It was found that the delivery efficiency and cell viability were closely related to the centrifuge speed. We speculated that the burst of microbubbles causes transient pore opening thus increasing the chance of biomolecules entering cells. This fast, low-cost and easy-to-operate protocol is very promising for delivering therapeutic genes and drugs into any cells which do not actively take up extracellular materials. This method is most effective for in-vitro delivery, but after delivery, treated cells might be injected back to human for in-vivo imaging.

[1]  R. Karshafian,et al.  Ultrasound-induced uptake of different size markers in mammalian cells , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[2]  D. Scherman,et al.  Electrotransfer into skeletal muscle for protein expression. , 2006, Current gene therapy.

[3]  Akimasa Nakao,et al.  Gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma using sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents , 2005, Cancer Gene Therapy.

[4]  James Xing,et al.  Efficient and rapid uptake of magnetic carbon nanotubes into human monocytic cells: implications for cell-based cancer gene therapy , 2012, Biotechnology Letters.

[5]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Ayache Bouakaz,et al.  Theoretical investigation of shear stress generated by a contrast microbubble on the cell membrane as a mechanism for sonoporation. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  E. Neumann,et al.  Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. , 1982, The EMBO journal.

[8]  J. Wiebe,et al.  Inhibition of cell proliferation by glycerol. , 1991, Life sciences.

[9]  Stefan Lorkowski,et al.  Efficient non-viral transfection of THP-1 cells. , 2009, Journal of immunological methods.

[10]  Joachim Wegener,et al.  Recovery of adherent cells after in situ electroporation monitored electrically. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[11]  Victor Frenkel,et al.  Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[12]  I. Schmidt-Wolf,et al.  Regulatable systemic production of monoclonal antibodies by in vivo muscle electroporation , 2004, Genetic vaccines and therapy.

[13]  A. McHale,et al.  Optimising ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in vitro and prolonged expression of a transgene in vivo: potential applications for gene therapy of cancer. , 2009, Cancer letters.

[14]  Damijan Miklavcic,et al.  Real time electroporation control for accurate and safe in vivo non-viral gene therapy. , 2007, Bioelectrochemistry.

[15]  Juan Tu,et al.  The correlation between acoustic cavitation and sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI) in vitro. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[16]  K. Romøren,et al.  Transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity of cationic liposomes in primary cultures of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) gill cells. , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  M Cormier,et al.  Effect of proteins on the assessment of surfactant cytotoxicity by an in vitro test: Possible correlations with in vivo data. , 1987, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.